GENERAL55525

• Permit No: M1983194
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 2/28/1990
• Doc Name: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WOLF RIDGE CORP MINE PLAN FOR A NAHCOLITE SOLUTION MINE
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

TABLE OF CONTENTS
7. GLOSSARY
7.1 List of Abbreviations .......................................... 7-5
8.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 Summary Table Showing Major Differences
Between Altematives .................................... .... 2-33
Table 2-2 Summary of Impacts ................................ .... 2-34
Table 3-1 Characteristics of Piceance and Yellow Creeks ............ ..... 3-8
Table 3-2 Water Quality Parameters for the Sodium Lease Area
and Sta[eStandards ..................................... .... 3-13
Table 3-3 Soil Mapping Units Occurring on the Lease Area .......... .... 3-14
Table 3-4 Soil Mapping Units Occurring on the
Sodium Lease Area and Their Physical Characteristics .......... .... 3- I S
Table 3-5 Known Cultural Resources Within the Proposed Action
and Altematives Project Area ............................. .... 3-24
Table 3-6 Curtent Employment by Place of Residence .............. .... 3-28
Table 3-7 1985 Population ................................... .... 3-27
Table3-8 1984 Housing Units ................................. .... 3-29
Table 3-9 1984 Local Government Financial Data ................. .... 3-29
Table 4-1 Maximum Predicted Ambient Concentrations
Resulting From WRC Altematives ........................ ...... 4-2
Table 4-2 Emission Rates for Altema[ives vs. Pilot Plant
and EPA Significant Emissions ........................... ...... 4-3
Table 4-3 Water Quantity Effects ............................. ..... 4-10
Table 4-4 Affected Soil Mapping Unit by Altemative .............. ..... 4-14
Table 45 Vegetation Type and Acreage ........................ ..... 4-15
Table 46 Summary of Mule Deer Habitat Losses ................. ..... 4-17
Table 4-7 Summary of Raptor Habitat Loss and/or Modification ..... ..... 4-19
Table 4-8 Sites Affected Under Alternatives ..................... ..... 4-21
Table 4-9 Cultural Resource Management Sites Impacted by
Cumulative Development in the Piceance Basin .............. ..... 4-23
Table 4-10 Affected Paleontological Sites ....................... ..... 4-23
Table 4-f I Known Paleontological Localities in Piceance Basin ...... ..... 4-23
Table 4-12 Population ...................................... ..... 4-25
Table 4-13 County Employment .............................. ..... 4-26
Table4.l4 County Laborlncome ............................. ..... 4-27
Table 4-15 Housing Units ................................... ..... 4-28
Table 4-16 Energy Requirements .............................. ..... 4-30
Table B-1 Applicable State and Federal
Ambient Air Quality Standards .......................... ..... 6.2-1
Table B-2 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Increments ....... ..... 6.2-1
Table B-3 Categories o(Potential Air Quality Impacts
on Air Quality Related Values of Class 1 Areas .............. ..... 6.2-2
Table C-1 No Action ...................................... ..... 6.3-1
Table C-2 50,000 TPY Altemative ............................ ..... 6.3-2
Table C-3 Proposed Action .........' ......................... ..... 6.3-2
Table C~ 500,000 TPY Alternative ........................... ..... 6.3-3