My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55525
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:31 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:32:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/28/1990
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WOLF RIDGE CORP MINE PLAN FOR A NAHCOLITE SOLUTION MINE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. PURPOSE AND NEED <br />1.1 Purpose and Need for the <br />Proposed Action <br />Piceance Basin. It is also consistent with state policy and <br />local land use goals for this area. <br />Wolf Ridge Corporation (WRC) has submitted a mine <br />plan to the Bureau of land Managertient pursuant to federal <br />regulation 43 CFR 3570. This mine plan proposes <br />construction and operation of a commercial-scale nahcolite <br />solution mine that will produce a maximum of 125,000 <br />tons per year (tpy) of sodium bicarbonate over a 30-year <br />period. The proposal is for asite-specific mining operation <br />initially producing 50,000 tpy, with escalation in the second <br />or third year to 125,000 tpy. WR(:'s four sodium leases <br />total approximately 8,222 acres and are located within the <br />Piceance Basin in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. Please see <br />Map I-1 for the general location of the sodium project <br />area within the Piceance Basin Planning Area. <br />The product, sodium bicarbonatt; would be produced <br />by mining nahcoli[e (naturally occurring sodium bicarbo- <br />note). Curtently, all sodium bicarbtmate produced in the <br />world is synthetically manufactured. WRC officials believe <br />that they can produce the lowest cost sodium bicarbonate <br />through solution mining; thus, they could easily penetrate <br />the existing U.S. market, which utilizes approximately <br />380,000 tons per year. <br />1.2 Proposed Action <br />WRC's proposed action involves construction and <br />operation of a commercial-scale solution mine to produce <br />nahcolite at a maximum rate of 125,000 tpy over a 30- <br />year period. The proposal involves phased-approach <br />development, with initial production of 50,000 tpy increasing <br />in the second or third year of operation to 125,000 tpy. <br />The proposed project includes a well Field for in situ <br />solution mining of nahcolite; a handling and processing plant; <br />evaporation ponds; and associated transportation, access, and <br />support facilities, including natural gt~s and water pipelines, <br />access roads, and astorage/rail-loading facility at Lacy <br />Station railhead in Rifle, Colorado. <br />According to WRC's current schedule, site construction <br />would begin in early 1987, with the fir,;t production occurring <br />in the second quarter of 1988. <br />For a detailed description of W RC's proposal, please refer <br />to the narrative on the Proposed Action in Chapter 2, <br />Description o(the Alternatives. <br />The Proposed Action is in conformance with the current <br />Management Framework Plan for the While River Resource <br />Area and the proposed Resource Management Plan For the <br />1.3 Initiation and Purpose of the EIS <br />On October 9, 1984, WRC submitted a mine plan to <br />BLM for acommercial-scale nahcolite solution mine on <br />Federal sodium leases it holds in Piceance Basin. Initial <br />internal screening of the mine plan indicated that it <br />represented a major federal action with the potential (or <br />significant impacts; therefore, pursuant to Section 102 of <br />the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), <br />BLM determined that an EIS would be required in <br />conjunction with approval of W RC's commercial-scale mine <br />plan. <br />The purpose of this EIS is to analyze and define the <br />potential environmental and socioeconomic effects of <br />implementing the Proposed Action and a range of reasonable <br />altematives. In addition, the EIS is intended to identify <br />necessary mitigation and special stipulations that would be <br />incorporated into [he approved plan. <br />1.4 Summary of Scoping Process and <br />Issues <br />Pursuant to federal regulation 40 CFR 1501.7, the Scoping <br />process involves defining significant environmental and <br />socioeconomic issues that may result from approval of the <br />Proposed Action. In addition, Scoping helps define a range <br />of reasonable altematives to be analyzed along with the <br />Proposed Action in the EIS. <br />The Scoping process has been formal through a 30-0ay <br />written comment period and through public meetings held <br />in Meeker on June 18 and Grand Junction, Colorado, on <br />June 19, 1985. This formal swping period was initiated <br />on May 31, 1985, when BLM filed a Notice of Intent in <br />the Federa/ Regisrer to prepare an EIS and to hold public <br />Scoping meetings. Formal Scoping ended on July 1, 1985. <br />Informal Scoping was initiated before formal Scoping. This <br />involved intemal review of WRC's mine plan (Proposed <br />Action) and direct contact by the lead BLM office with <br />other BLM offices, other agencies, state and local government <br />offices, and private individuals. <br />As a result of both informal and formal Scoping, a range <br />of reasonable alternatives was developed and major issues <br />identified for analysis in this EIS. For a description and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.