My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55525
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:31 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:32:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/28/1990
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WOLF RIDGE CORP MINE PLAN FOR A NAHCOLITE SOLUTION MINE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY <br />On October 9, 1984, Wolf Ridge Corporation (WRC), <br />the holder of four federal sodium lease tracts within the <br />Piceance Basin in northwest Colorado, submitted a mine <br />plan to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for a <br />commercial-scale nahcolite solution mine. Initial screening <br />of the mine plan indicated that it represented a major federal <br />action with the potential for significant impacts; therefore, <br />pursuant to Section 102 of the National Environmental <br />Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), BLM determined that an <br />environmental impact statement (EIS) would be required <br />in conjunction with approval of the mine plan. <br />Four alternatives, including N/RC's proposal, are <br />described and analyzed in this EIS. The purpose of this <br />E1S is to analyze and define the potential environmental <br />and socioeconomic effects of each of these alternatives. In <br />addition, the EIS identifies necessary mitigation in the form <br />of stipulations that would be incorporated into the approved <br />plan. <br />The following narrative briefly describes each of the <br />alternatives and summarizes their anticipated impacts. <br />No Action Alternative <br />This alternative involves construction and operation of <br />a 6-ton per year (tpy), 2-year maximum pilot-scale nahcolite <br />mine that was analyzed and approved by BLM in an <br />environmental assessment (EA Number CO-010-86-07) on <br />May 2, 1986. Thereiore, this aMion (pilot-scale mine) is <br />independent of WRC's commercial-scale mine plan and can <br />occur, regardless of the outcome of this EIS. <br />Under the No Action Alternative, the approved pilot <br />project will take place; however, expansion of the approved <br />pilot project to a commercial-scale project will not occur. <br />Facilities approved under the pilot project include: a 5- <br />acre plant site, a 4-acre well field (or in situ solution mining <br />of nahcolite, an evaporation pond encompassing 4 acres, <br />a new water well and ancillary pipeline, and upgrading <br />(including graveling) of the existing access road into the <br />plant site. <br />No significant adverse impacts will result from the No <br />Action (Pilot Project) Alternative. Minor short-term impacts <br />will occur to air quality, soils, vegetation, livestock grazing, <br />water resources, wildlife, and recreational/visual resources. <br />Cultural and paleontological resources will also be <br />potentially impacted. Existing and future mineral lease rights <br />could be complicated because of diminished surface <br />occupancy possibilities within the project development area. <br />Groundwater consumed by the pilot project will <br />contribute cumulatively to adverse alterations of downstream <br />endangered fish habitat, although the project, by itself, will <br />probably notjeopardize the continued existence of any listed <br />fish. Mitigation (conservation measures) will compensate for <br />this impact. <br />Proposed Action <br />WRC's proposal involves consvuction and operation of <br />a commercial-scale nahcolite solution mine to produce <br />sodium bicarbonate at a maximum rate of 125,000 tpy over <br />a 30-year period. The proposal involves phased-approach <br />development, with initial production of 50,000 tpy, <br />increasing in the second or third year of operation to 125,000 <br />tpy. <br />The Proposed Action would involve: expansion of the <br />approved pilot project well field and plant site, paving of <br />the access road into the plant site (affecting up to 215 <br />additional acres), construction of additional evaporation <br />ponds (affecting up to 22 additional acres), construction <br />of a natural gas pipeline into the plant site (involving l7 <br />acres), and addition of a warehouse/rail loading facility at <br />Lacy Station in Rifle, Colorado. <br />The only potentially significant adverse impacts associated <br />with this alternative would be to local groundwater quantity <br />and quality. There would be a 5 percent reduction in average <br />daily flow from Yellow Creek. This could be mitigated <br />through a state required water augmentation plan. The area <br />of the base of the lower aquifer in contact with salts would <br />increase by approximately 20 percent within [he lease tracts. <br />The resources described as being affected under the No <br />Action, in most cases, would be impacted to a greater degree <br />under this alternative because of the 30-year project life. <br />Potential surface subsidence of less than 1 foot would also <br />occur; however, none of these impacts would be considered <br />significant after application of mitigation. <br />50,000 TPY Alternative <br />This alternative would involve construction and operation <br />of a 30-year solution mine producing 50,000 tpy of sodium <br />bicarbonate. It would essentially be an expansion of the <br />2-year pilot project to a 30.year commercial facility. It would <br />involve similar, but less expansion than described under the <br />Proposed Action, except the atx;ess road would not be paved <br />and the Lacy Station warehouse/rail loading facility would <br />not be utilized. Approximately 90 acres of additional land <br />would be associated with expansion of the well field. <br />Additional evaporation ponds would be required, affecting <br />approximately 10 acres. <br />S-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.