Laserfiche WebLink
that pollutants will be diluted at least 19 times before reaching a stream (see aluminum, Table 1 ). For ore <br />piles, it should be demonstrated that contaminants will be diluted at least 50 times before reaching <br />groundwater (see selenium, Table 1). <br />I understand that the operator at the SM-18 mine. already has constructed a small runoff retention feature <br />below the ore piles to establish some protection for groundwater. This pond should retain all of the nno <br />anticipated from some design storm: I would recommend at least the 100-yeaz storm. If water in this <br />pond is meant to evaporate rather than leach slowly into groundwater, there should be measures in place <br />to prevent evaporite residues in the pond from becoming blowing dust. Land application of the fluids <br />maybe acceptable provided the pemut is revised appropriately. <br />There is precedent in the Division allowing dilution of contaminants with fresh water or groundwater in <br />order to meet groundwater numeric protection levels. If dilution is selected as a means of meeting <br />groundwater numeric protection levels, the operator should construct a model showing what dilution rates <br />can be expected if rain or snow melt drives pollutants from the rock piles into local groundwater. <br />Numeric protection levels may also need to be developed if high ambient levels aze to be considered in <br />the dilution calculations. <br />The division should carefully evaluate the proximity of ore and waste rock piles to surface and <br />groundwater resources. This will require site-specific examinations that consider proximity to streams, <br />proximity to groundwater, size of ore and waste rock facilities, duration of their exposure to weathering, <br />and reclamation and closure techniques. <br />Discussion: The Synthetic Precipitation Leach Procedure (EPA Method SW-846) requires adding 2 liters <br />e€~lightly aeid~ed-deioai2ed ~vater{initiai~H-=-4.2-using amixture-of~z~64 and-I3N03-(sulfinic~trd <br />nitric acid) to 100 g of powdered sample, and agitating the mixture end-over-end at 302 rpm for 18 hours. <br />It is recognized that the SPLP is an aggressive test that tends to overstate the amount of pollutants that <br />may derive from a rock mass under natural conditions, unless their natural state is to be crushed as in the <br />SPLP. Test results for this study are considered maxima that might be expected under worst-case <br />conditions. Although the test is chemically more aggressive than natural conditions might allow, the tests <br />do indicate what pazameters are likely to appear under natural conditions. Operators may wish to focus <br />on these parameters primarily to m;n;mize the release of contaminants from their operations. <br />Overall, I believe the facilities need to examine their ore and waste handling procedures in context of <br />potential exposure to ground and surface water. <br />Cc: Bruce Humphries <br />Carl Mount <br />Wally Erickson <br />Bob Oswald <br />Kate Pickford <br />Allen Sorenson <br />3 <br />