My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55507
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:30:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/27/2006
Doc Name
Response to 10/30/06 DRMS Letter re Landslide
From
Trapper Mining Inc.
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESPONSE: Because of the lack of available data, and the apparent <br />impossibility of generating data adequate to the task, we do not know at <br />this point whether it will be possible to describe and charaMerize the <br />structural geology of the slide area to a reasonable degree of certainty. <br />We will provide a description of the possible structural geology of the <br />slide area, based on the limited data available, with our Phase I report. <br />Because it is difficult to describe to a reasonable degree of certainty the <br />structural geology of the slide area, we are currently uncertain whether it <br />will be possible to reach a conclusion concerning the effect the actual <br />structural geology may have had on the landslide. We are continuing <br />our analysis of this issue, and will include a statement of our current <br />impressions in our Phase II report <br />The location and extent of the "scoria" outcrop neaz the southwest comer of the landslide. <br />Please determine whether this geologic feature contributed to the landslide. <br />RESPONSE: We will provide a map showing the location of the "scoria" <br />outcrop by no later than December 8, 2006. At the present time we do <br />not believe it possible to determine to a reasonable degree of certainty <br />whether this outcrop had any effect on the landslide. Our current <br />impression is that it did not. We will include any update of our thinking <br />in this regard in our Phase II report. <br />The sheaz strength, cohesion, and angle of friction of the materials in the failure <br />surface/zone. <br />RESPONSE: We will include in our Phase I report our initial <br />impression of the location of the failure surface/zone and of the shear <br />strength, cohesion and angle of friction of that zone, based on the limited <br />bore hole data available. We will include an update of our thinking on <br />this topic in our Phase II report <br />The amount and weight of materials that contributed to the driving forces of the slide. <br />RESPONSE: We do not know at this point whether it will be possible to <br />determine the "driving forces" of the landslide, given currently available <br />data. We also do not know at this point whether it will be possible to <br />defmitively characterize the volume or mass of material involved in the <br />landslide or to estimate quantitatively its weight and volume. Even if <br />that proves to be possible, we do not know whether it will be possible to <br />determine to a reasonable degree of certainty whether this mass or <br />volume contributed to the driving forces of the landslide. We will <br />include our current impressions on these topics in Phase II of our report, <br />and provide then our opinion on the feasibility of reaching a definitive <br />conclusion on them. <br />The total forces that drove the slide, the resistive forces from side or boundary conditions, <br />and the forces that arrested the slide. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.