My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55476
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/21/1993
Doc Name
GRASSY GAP MINE ROCKCASTLE COAL CO C-81-039
From
DMG
To
ROD PECK
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Oenver, CO 80203 <br />Phone:1303)866-3567 <br />FAx: (3031832-8106 <br />January 21, 1993 <br />Mr. Rod Peck <br />506 Breeze Street <br />Craig, CO 81625 <br />Re: Grassy Gap Mine, Rockcastle Coal Co., C-81-039 <br />Dear Mr. Peck: <br />of CO~o <br />.`~l~A~a <br />Rov Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Loop <br />Division Director <br />This letter is to inform you that the Division received your letter dated <br />January 13, 1993. I want to take this opportunity to reiterate our subsequent <br />phone conversation as well as respond to the key elements of your letter. <br />It is the Division's opinion that at this time the "ball is in <br />Rockcastle's court". We are expecting that they (Rockcastle) will <br />initiate dialogue with you in the very immediate future concerning: <br />a) possible escrowing of $10,000.00; <br />b) payment of 1992 weed spraying; <br />c) planning for 1993 weed spraying. <br />Also, this discussion would include the evaluation and implementation of <br />reseeding of the 1992 revegetation areas should they need it. <br />2. Although Routt County may have cost sharing funds available the Division <br />does not consider it likely and has not considered this factor in its <br />decision making process. <br />3. The bond release decision public comment period expires February 1, <br />1992. If there are no public comments and if the Division has not heard <br />From Rockcastle by February 15th, the Division will intervene to attempt <br />to work out the details concerning weed spraying. <br />4. Additionally, I am investigating the bid process to address the weed <br />spraying once Rockcastle is out of the picture. I will let you know the <br />details as soon as I can get some answers from the knowledgeable parties. <br />I assure you we are aware of your concerns on the timing of the weed spraying <br />and will do everything in our power to see that an acceptable plan is in place <br />prior to April 1, 1993. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.