Laserfiche WebLink
special provisions within the <br />permit. <br />5.6 11, 12 s 13. These three stipula- <br />tions relate to haul roads and <br />access roads on the permit area <br />and the scope of the bond required <br />of the applicant as a condition to <br />permit issuance. The applicant <br />objects to the requirements con- <br />tained in Stipulations 11 and 12 <br />. with respect to the haul road and <br />access roads for the reason that <br />such roads, for the most part, are <br />intended to be permanent struct- <br />ures consistent with the proposed <br />~ post-mining land use and to be <br />i' ! -~ left in place at the request of <br />~-' the surface land owner. The <br />Division's interpretation of its <br />C= - ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ regulations with respect to pos- <br />~ sible reclamation of these road <br />~~'' _. - , _ ~ - -'_~.-_- i areas and the development of a <br />_ _, contingency plan for "worst case" <br />v '.-~ ~ % analyses is not supported by <br />underlying law and reflects an <br />abuse of the Division's discretion <br />in interpreting its own regulatory <br />program. <br />Stipulation 13 requests a proposed <br />bond in. the amount of 5685,000.00 <br />which is substantially in excess <br />of the bond originally posted at <br />the time the applicant obtained <br />its original permit. The appli- <br />cant specifically asserts that the <br />amount of the bond is excessive <br />based upon the "worst case" analy- <br />ses conducted by the Division, <br />quantities of materials poten- <br />tially requiring reclamation and <br />the Division's determination of <br />costs associated with such poten- <br />tial reclamation. A good portion <br />of such bond cost is based upon <br />the Division's proposed reclama- <br />tion of haul and access roads. <br />-4- <br />