My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL54860
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL54860
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:00 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:52:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977573
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/2/1986
Doc Name
PUEBLO WEST PIT FN M-77-573 RAILROAD BALLAST MATERIAL
From
MLRD
To
VALCO INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DI1 <br />DAVID C. SHELTO N, Director <br />December 2, 1986 <br />Mr. 14ark K1 une <br />General Idanager <br />VALCO, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 857 <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81002 <br />Re: Pueblo West Pit, File No. M-77-573 <br />Railroad Ballast Material <br />Dear Mr. Klune: <br />This letter will verify our telephone conversation on November 18, 1986, and <br />is also in response to your letter written on November 25, 1986. <br />On September 25, 1986, the Board approved an amendment to Permit No. <br />M-77-573. The amendment approval included the use of railroad ballast <br />material for backfill in the lakeshore areas of Phase I. The placement of <br />this ballast material beneath the water table was contingent upon a <br />determination that the ballast was suitable for this purpose and would not <br />adversely affect the water quality. Hazen Research, Inc. performed an E.P. <br />Toxicity Test Dn a representative sample, and the results indicated that the <br />material was non-toxic. On approximately November 18, 1986, I discussed the <br />matter with Robert Rostad of Hazen Research, Inc. Mr. Rostad confirmed that <br />the railroad ballast was non-toxic based on the E.P. Toxicity test. Mr. <br />Rostad stated that the material was probably inert and contained no <br />hydrocarbon contaminants, based on the fact that the material was probably <br />very high temperature smelter slag. However, he suggested that the material <br />may have been contaminated by oil, grease, or other hydrocarbons spilled or <br />leaked along the railroad tracks. Mr. Rostad recommended that a visual and <br />"smell" inspection be performed on the material to detect oil or grease. He <br />recommended that any material suspected of containing oil or grease be placed <br />in water and visually inspected for an oil film. I relayed these <br />recommendations to Mr. Klune. <br />Mark, your letter of November 25 confirms that these final tests were <br />performed according to Mr. Rostad's recommendation. You stated that no signs <br />of hydrocarbon contamination were detected. Therefore, this letter confirms <br />that the railroad ballast is geochemically suitable for placement beneath the <br />water table as lakeshore backfill material. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 856-3567 <br />ROCKY FORD LAMAR CANON CITY <br />G UN NISON <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.