Laserfiche WebLink
Table 5: Moffat Area Block 4 Erosion Condition Classification <br />' Possible <br />Item Score 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 <br />Soil Movement 14 1 0 0 3 3 3 <br />' Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 3 0 3 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />' <br />Flow Pattems I S 0 0 3 3 6 6 <br />Rills 14 3 6 6 6 3 6 <br />Gullies 1~ 2 3 3 3 6 6 <br />L <br />Total 100 6 9 12 18 18 26 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Slight <br />Block 5 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for th is site was 18, which placed it in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for t his survey are shown i n Table 6. Several gu llies <br />in this block were repaired in 1995. Gullies have formed above the downdrain area on the north <br />' side. Corrective measures planned as a resu lt of this inventory includes ro ughing-up and <br />reseeding gullies associated with [he downdrain. <br />' Table 6: Moffat Area Block 5 Erosion Condition Cl assification <br />Possible <br />' <br />Item Score 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 <br />Soil Movement 14 3 0 0 3 3 ~ <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 3 0 3 <br />' <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Pattems 15 3 0 0 0 3 9 <br />' <br />Rills 14 6 3 3 3 ~ 9 <br />Gullies 15 6 3 3 0 8 6 <br />Total 100 18 6 6 9 21 32 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Slight Slight <br />t Block 6 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for th is site was 11, which placed it i n the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey are shown in Table 7. No corrective <br />measures planned as a result of the inventory. <br />6 <br />