Laserfiche WebLink
multiple names are listed on an appeal, identification of the lead appellant (§ 215.2) and <br />verification of the identity of the lead appellant upon request; (4) The name of the project or <br />activity for which the decision was made, the name and title of the Responsible Official, and the <br />date of the decision; (5) The regulation under which the appeal is being filed, when there is an <br />option to appeal under either this part (§ 215.11(d)); (6) Any specific change(s) in the decision <br />that the appellant seeks and rationale for those changes; (7) Any portion(s) of the decision with <br />which the appellant disagrees, and explanation for the disagreement; (8) Why the appellant <br />believes the Responsible Official's decision failed to consider the substantive comments; and (9) <br />How the appellant believes the decision specifically violates law; regulation, or policy. Notices <br />of Appeal that do not meet the requirements of 36 CFR 215.14 will be dismissed. <br />Pursuant to 36 CFR 215.9(x), if no appeal is filed, implementation of this decision may occur on, <br />but not before, the fifth day from the close of the appeal period. <br />Copies of this FEIS and decision maybe downloaded from the Internet at: <br />http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/~nug/policy/ <br />For further information or to obtain copies of the FEIS/ROD, please contact Niccole Mortenson, <br />Engineering and Minerals NEPA Project Specialist, at 970-874-6616 or nmortenson fs.fed.us. <br />Sincerely, <br />\~~ <br />CHARLES S. RICHMOND <br />Forest Supervisor <br />Enclosure <br />