Laserfiche WebLink
1 , •J • <br />• <br />To assist with the assessment of the water-quality data for the humidity cells, the following <br />Table 2 itemizes the ICP scan and AccuLabs ICP and AA data sets generated to date and <br />contained in the CC&V submission. This Table 2 provides a guide to the overlap between <br />analytical data sets. Again, these analyses are continuing. <br />TABLE 2. TABULATION OF COMPREHENSIVE WATER-QUAI~TY ANALYSES FOR HUMIDITY CFA r c <br />SAMPLE NUMBER (CORD ICP SCAN (Number of Sele of <br />Amly~n) Acculebs (Numbcr of Sele of <br />Amlyw) <br />CB-6132 1 <br />CC 904 (245-250) 1 <br />CC 90-5 (190.195) 1 <br />CC 92-I4 14 <br />CC 91-14(135.138) 1 <br />CC 92-23 (186-196) 2 2 <br />CC 92-26(178-188) 2 <br />CC 92-28(267.277) 2 2 <br />CC 92-33A 14 <br />CC 92-33A (186196) 2 2 <br />CC 92.36 (29-32) I <br />CC 92-38(105.115) 2 2 <br />CC 92-40 p05.312.5) 2 2 <br />CC 92.41A 14 <br />CC 92-02A 7 <br />CC 92-48 7 <br />CC 9248 (40-50) 2 2 <br />CC 92-09 (81-9q 2 2 <br />CC 92-49 (245-250) 2 <br />CC 92-61 14 <br />CR-437(120-140) 2 2 <br />CR-526 (450-490) 2 2 <br />Applicable Water- Ouality Standards. <br />Dr. Posey continues, in the Memorandum "CC&V has taken an approach to data <br />interpretation that probably will not be acceptable either to DMG or to CDPHE. They <br />conclude that the "ambient" water quality measured at Arequa Gulch WQCD Station M1 is <br />the criterion to aim for in terms of water quality. And this conclusion is drawn even though <br />many of the surface water quality measurements at AG-1 are not in compliance with the <br />5 <br />