Laserfiche WebLink
Count <br />Bag # i meter sq. 4x Conversion Factor Grams per meter sq. <br />49 7-1 205.8 <br />50 11-7 11.1 <br />51 1-6 120.4 <br />52 '5-5? 41.3 <br />53 7-3 25.3 <br />54 5-1 94.1 <br />55 16-2 185.8 <br />56 4-1 64.3 <br />57 6-8 191.4 <br />' 58 11-5 192.6 <br />59 12-2 102.6 <br />60 7-7 104.0 <br />61 7-5 61.3 <br />62 4-2 73.3 <br />' 63 12-4 65.9 <br />64 11-3 69.1 <br />' 65 10-4 298.3 <br />' 66 8-2 269.9 <br />~ 67 13-3 56.8 <br />68 10-6 136.8 <br />69 1-1 29.1 <br />' 70 8-6 60.8 <br />71 8-4 115.5 <br />72 9-5 137.1 <br />73 <br />' 10-2 119.2 <br /> Sample Mean 134.0 <br /> Sample Median 113.2 <br /> Sample Variance 9359.4 <br /> Sample Std. Deviation 96.7 <br /> Sample size 73 <br /> Table T (0.10, n-1 df) 1.294 <br /> Table T (0.20, n-1 df) 0.847 <br />Required sample size (nmin) 87 <br />Production Standard 125 g/sq.m <br />90% of standard (in g/sq.m) 112.5 <br />Standard Error 11.3 <br />Reverse Null T-test <br />Tcalc 1.896 <br />Ttable 0.847 <br />Since Tcalc is greater than Ttable, the null hypothesis of failure is rejected. The conclusion is <br />that production has been demonstrated to exceed the standard, at the 80% level of confidence. <br />Note, the quarter meter plot samples were in the pond/topsoil stockpile area, a relatively more uniform <br />stand dominated by smooth brome. <br />The 1 square meter plot samples were in the larger, primary mine disturbance area, a more variable, <br />lower productivity stand. <br />