My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL54007
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL54007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:22 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:09:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/14/1995
Doc Name
TATUM RESIDENCE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS
From
DMG
To
SUSAN MCCANNON
Permit Index Doc Type
CITIZEN COMPLAINTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~• <br /> <br />I suspect that Mr. Gerity is inappropriately comparing mechanical <br />observations conducted above retreat-extracted conventional mining <br />and longwall extraction at the Allen Mine (now referred to as the <br />New Elk Mine) with the expressly non-retreated "limited-extraction" <br />conventional mining in the portion of the Golden Eagle underground <br />workings in question. I would have to review the Woodward-Clyde <br />report to complete this determination. I am also not familiar with <br />the specific commercial version of the subsidence prediction <br />software referenced by Mr. Gerity. I would have to obtain and <br />manipulate the software in order to complete an opinion regarding <br />the applicability of the particular modeling he has completed. <br />In order to complete the analyses suggested above I project that <br />approximately one to two man weeks would be required. My schedule <br />is such that the earliest opening in my schedule which would <br />accommodate such a demand might occur in July. The other <br />professionals on State staff, Bruce Stover of our Division or Jeff <br />Hynes of the Colorado Geological Survey, have equally committed <br />schedules. Other options, such as contracting with a consultant <br />would be prohibitively time demanding and inordinately expensive. <br />Based upon my original examination of the Tatum residence and the <br />surrounding area, my review of the reports submitted by the Tatums, <br />and my discussions with Mike Rosenthal, it is my recommendation <br />that the Division not expend any additional professional effort in <br />responding to the Tatum's allegations. The OSM has found our <br />response to the TDN to be acceptable. If the Tatum's chose to <br />pursue litigation, time will be available with which to complete <br />additional analyses. <br />In closing, I feel compelled to reiterate a point I have made <br />previously. The Tatum's residence, for whatever reason, is <br />experiencing extreme structural and architectural distress. The <br />structure is a significant historical and architectural resource, <br />which I suspect would easily qualify for inclusion on the National <br />Registry of Historic Structures. The distress was severe enough at <br />the time that I examined the building, that it might conceivably <br />expose the occupants and the structure to hazard if it is allowed <br />to worsen. I hope that the Tatum's are taking appropriate steps to <br />accomplish necessary remedial activity. The longer that remedial <br />activity is delayed the more significant and costly the required <br />repairs may become. <br />cc: Mike Rosenthal, OSM <br />Dan Hernandez <br />Randy Price <br />Mike Long, Director <br />Doc: M:\COAL\JAP\TATUM.NO <br />JP/JP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.