My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53971
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:07:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004078
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/10/2006
Doc Name
Andrew Chavers-Ditch Rights
From
James K. Kreutz & Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. Chavers deny the allegations contained in paragraph 22 of TKO's Complaint and <br />without waiving such denial admit they intend to pursue all claims for damages, to and include <br />injunctive action to further prevent damages to Chavers horses, crop damage, interference with <br />potential sale of the property, and other matters asserted in paragraph 22 of Plaintiffs' Complaint. <br />10. Chavers is without sufficiem information or lrnowledge as to the allegations <br />contained in paragraph 23 of TKO's Complaint and therefore deny same. <br />11. Chavers deny the allegations contained in paragraph 24 of TKO's Complaint <br />without waiving such denial and specifically deny that "Plaintiffs' wish to develop a ditch <br />stabilization and control plan ..." <br />12. Chavers deny the allegations contained in paragraph 25 of TKO's Complaint as it <br />may pertain to Chavers. <br />13. Chavers deny the allegations contained in paragraph(s) 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and <br />32 of TKO's Complaint without waiving such denial admit that a cattle crossing was placed under <br />Highway 85, and such cattle crossing was not for the purpose of allowing discharge upon the land <br />of the Plaintiffs' to be discharged upon the land of Chavers. The "culvert" was developed for <br />purposes of a cattle crossing under Highway 85 since the prior owners of TKO's land and <br />Chavers land were one and the same owner at the time of the placen-ent of the cattle crossing. <br />14. Chavers deny the allegations contained in TKO's First, Second, Third, Fourth and <br />Fifth Claim for Relief. <br />Plaintiffs' have failed to mitigate. <br />2. Plaintiffs' have failed to state a cause of action against these Defendants for which <br />relief can be granted. <br />3. Plaintiff's are estopped from asserting such claims, and Chavers asserts the defense <br />of waiver and estoppel. <br />4. Plaintiffs' have violated the "Clean Hands Doctrine", and therefore should be <br />denied any equitable relief. <br />5. The alleged seepage ditches as asserted by these Plaintiffs' had been abandoned <br />and therefore the Statute of Limitations have run relative to any claims with respect to such <br />ditches. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.