Laserfiche WebLink
363 659$223 P. 12 <br />extract, process, sell, use and remove material duririg'tlu term of the lease. <br />46, The Defendants Chavers in this case knew about the contract between the Plaintiff <br />and Lafarge because they were present during public hearings, which resulted in public records <br />of the agreement, because the Plaintiff disclosed information regarding the contract to <br />Defendants Chavers, and because of the physical. inspection of the Defendants Chavers' <br />property, at which time the Defendants Chavers would have observed Lafarge's company trucks <br />on the property. <br />47. Because the Defendant is refusing the Plaintiff access to the easement, a request has <br />been made aot to allow any water to run through the area. Lafarge has stated that until the <br />Plaintiff resolves the issue'with the Defendant, there is to be no more discharge'of any water <br />from the site, including any irrigation water. As a result, water is pooling and there is same <br />concern that this will erode the banks and walls of the highway. Lafarge has ceased certain <br />operations until the dispute is settled. <br />48. Defendants Chavers' interference with the contract between the Plaintiff and <br />Lafarge is improper because discharge of water, including water used for irrigation purposes, has <br />ceased. Because Lafazge is responsible for discharge according to the permit, they have decided <br />that no discharge of any water, including irrigation water, is to leave the site. <br />49. The Defendants Chavers' interference with the contract between the Plaintiffs and <br />Lafazge will cause the Plaintiffs damages.and losses because Lafarge is bringing a suit against <br />the Plaintiffs claiming breach of contract. The Defendants are intentionally interfering with the <br />contractual obligation between the Plaintiff and Lafarge. <br />WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to grant the following relief: <br />a. Enter an order enjoining the Defendants from restricting the Plaintiffs' <br />right to access the Porter Seepage Ditch and the Ogilvie Seepage Ditch; <br />b. Enter an order declazing that the Plaintiffs have a right to the ditch for the <br />transportation of water to and from the Platte River in accordance with recorded documents; <br />c. Enter an order allowing Plaintiffs to recover its attorney fees and costs; <br />d. Enter an order allowing Plaintiffs w recover damages; <br />e. Enter an order to quiet title in favor of the Plaintiffs; and <br />g. Afford such other relief as may be proper. <br />