My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53971
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:07:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004078
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/10/2006
Doc Name
Andrew Chavers-Ditch Rights
From
James K. Kreutz & Associates
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the South Platte River. The Plaintiffs plan to stabilize and dry the area end back-fill and ro-seed <br />any portion that has been or will be disturbed due to Plaintiffs' use of the Ogilvie Ditch. <br />31. CDOT sent a letter complaining to the DMG regarding the alleged illicit discharge <br />of water and sediment into their right of way by SW TKO and Lafarge. CDOT claims that the <br />amotmt of water was well above the permitted quantities and that the sediment is not permissible <br />under today's standards. CDOT does not deny the fact that PlsintifPs have the right to convey 7 <br />cfs through the Ogilvie Ditch. <br />32. By constructing improvements for drainage under State Highway 85, CDOT has <br />recognized the right to transport water under the highway. Through the 1952 Settlement, CDOT <br />has acknowledged the right-of--way established on the Ogilvie property. In addition, through <br />their use of the drainage system on the median of Highway 85, CDOT has acknowledged the <br />presence and necessity of the Porter Seepage Ditch <br />VI. FIILST CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(Injunction) <br />33. There has been substantial interference with property that the Plaintiffs own and <br />their access rights to the Porter Seepage Ditch and the Ogilvie Seepage Ditch. <br />34. Irreparable harm will result to the Plaintiffs if they are not allowed use to the <br />Porter Seepage Ditch and the Ogilvie Seepage Ditch to transport water to the South Platte River. <br />35. An injunction in this matter would not be adverse to the public interest. <br />36. Accordingly, this Court shotild enjoin Defendants Chavers and Defendant CDOT <br />from preventing use or access to the ditches because the restriction would cause irrepazable harm <br />to the Plaintiffs. <br />VII. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(Declaratory Judgment) <br />37. Ptusuant to C.R.C.P. 57(a) and C.RS. § 13-51-105, Plaintiffs request that the <br />Court declare that the Plaintiffs have a right to the Porter Seepage Ditch and the Ogilvie Seepage <br />Ditch for the transportation of water to and from the South Platte River in accordance with <br />recorded documents. <br />P. 01 <br />VIII. TIIXIZ>JRA CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(Trespass) <br />(Plaintiffs v. Defendants Chavers) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.