My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53963
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53963
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:06:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/21/1986
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL1
From
Phase I for Pit Area but Not On Haul Road
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6- <br />The Division does not agree that the performance of seeding, fertilizing and <br />mulching constitutes successful establishment of revegetation. The Division <br />finds that the revegetation requirements of Rule 3.03.1(2)(b) relate both to <br />ensuring that vegetation is being re-established, and that the vegetation <br />provides erosion control. The Rules and Regulations clearly refer to the <br />establishment of vegetation as a necessary requirement for Phase II bond <br />release, and rocks and mulch do not qualify as vegetative cover pursuant to <br />this rule. These standards enables the Division to determine: 1) If the <br />revegetation plan has been followed; 2) If the existing cover is sufficient <br />to provide effective soil stabilization; and, 3) If progress is being made <br />toward the ultimate goal of providing a permanent, diverse, and effective <br />vegetative community. <br />The Division finds that because Sun Coal Company has not submitted technical <br />data with reference to successful establishment of revegetation (based on the <br />cover standards of Rule 4.15.8) and has not documented revegetation <br />methodology, it has not satisfied a minimum requirement for Phase II Bond <br />Release. In addition, field inspections have noted the existence of <br />substantial gullying on the backfilled area, indicating that an effective <br />stand of vegetation has not been reestablished. <br />Sus ended Solids Determination - The Division required Sun Coal Company to <br />submit tec nica ata w is emonstrates that levels of suspended solids <br />contributed to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area are comparable to <br />the pre-mining condition. <br />During the period of this review, the Division has been examining the policy <br />for the Phase II bond release suspended solids determination. The policy, <br />which is nearly completed, will allow the operator to compare suspended solids <br />measurements from sediment control structure outlets to undisturbed or <br />pre-mine data in order to meet the requirements of Phase II. Pond inflow data <br />or direct slope erosion measurements would be required only for pond removal, <br />but could also be used to meet Phase II requirements. <br />Without the benefit of this policy, Sun Coal Company has submitted <br />calculations using the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) to <br />demonstrate that the sediment yield on the backfilled area meets the Phase II <br />criteria. This type of demonstration would meet the more stringent <br />requirements for pond removal. The applicability of this equation on <br />reclaimed lands in the Western United States is somewhat questionable, and is <br />the subject of continuing scientific research. For this reason the equation <br />must be used conservatively and reviewed carefully. <br />After completing its review of the submittal, the Division rejects the <br />demonstration for the following reasons: <br />1. The soil erodability factor (K) is the same for disturbed and <br />undisturbed land. Division calculations using the soil erodability <br />nomograph, and soil compaction data supplied in the permit <br />application, indicate that this factor should differ between the <br />pre-mine versus post-mine conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.