My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53904
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:03:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/6/2000
Doc Name
RECORD OF DECISION Elk Creek Lease Tract COC 61357
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 2000 Record of Decision Pa a 12 <br />In April, July, and December 1999, newsletters were sent to individuals, organizations and <br />agencies on the EIS mailing list to inform them on progress of the EIS and provide relevant <br />information. <br />The Draft EIS was filed with the EPA and distributed to the public in late August 1999. The <br />Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS was published in the Federal Resister on September 3, <br />1999. In addition, the agencies transmitted press releases concerning the EIS project and <br />process to newspaper, radio stations and television stations. The media outlets covered the <br />North Fork Valley, Delta, Montrose, Crested Butte, Gunnison and Grand Junction areas. <br />A public information meeting was held on the evening of October 7, 1999 at the Hotchkiss High <br />School (Hotchkiss, Colorado) to explain and answer questions on the Draft EIS and the coal <br />leasing process. A formal public hearing was held on the evening of October 14, 1999 at the <br />Hotchkiss High School for interested individuals and organizations to make oral comments and <br />statements on the Draft EIS. <br />The formal comment period on the Draft EIS ended on November 3, 1999. Over 750 individual <br />comments were received. Agency response to public comments are given in Appendix O, <br />Public and Agency Participation and Involvement in the Draft EIS, found in the Final EIS. <br />Concurrent with the preparation of this EIS, the community has undertaken efforts to deal with <br />issues related to growth and coal mining in the North Fork Valley. Abroad spectrum of <br />interests came together to form the North Fork Coal Working Group (NFCWG) and to address <br />the issues identified. (See Final EIS Section 1.7.3, Community Efforts.) <br />The NFCWG is made up of local county governments, public interest groups, environmental <br />groups, the mining companies, water user groups and concerned individuals. Other segments <br />of the community including town and city governments, the Union Pacific Railroad, emergency <br />service providers, and other interested groups and individuals have participated in meetings of <br />the NFCWG and in public meetings sponsored by the NFCWG. The federal agencies have <br />worked with the NFCWG as invited parties to provide information and resources related to the <br />NEPA process and coal leasing in general. <br />The goals and objectives of the NFCWG are to work in a collaborative way and encourage the <br />development of the community's vision for its future. The NFCWG has provided a forum to <br />encourage community discussions, provided information and education on important issues, <br />and developed potential mitigation and resolutions for many community issues. In conjunction <br />with the NEPA process, the group has submitted information during scoping and provided <br />comments on the Draft EIS. <br />We recognize the efforts and hard work of the NFCWG to seek common ground and to identify <br />solutions to the problems identified by the community. As federal agencies, the BLM and the <br />Forest Service recognize and encourage the efforts of groups like the NFCWG in addressing <br />the off-site impacts of concern to the local community. Community based efforts, such as taken <br />by the NFCWG, can be very helpful and constructive at resolving issues at the local level. As <br />such, we applaud their efforts. We further believe that the Final EIS was improved as a result <br />of the comments received from the NFCWG. <br />BLM -Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.