My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53629
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
MEMO DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
From
STEIGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> ~ Legislative ®Executive <br /> COVER SHEET <br /> DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IlVIPACT STATEMENT <br />' YANKEE GULCH SODIUM MINERALS PROJECT <br /> Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Interior <br /> Bureau of Land Management, White River Resource Area <br /> Jurisdictions in Colorado that could be directly affected: Rio Blanco and Ga~eld Counties <br /> Abstract: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluates the effects of a <br /> commercial nahcolite solution mining operation near Meeker, Colorado with associated processing <br /> facilities near Parachute, Colorado. The project proponent, American Soda, L.L.P. (American Soda), <br /> proposes to develop a mining operation involving vertical solution mining wells to extract bedded <br /> and disseminated nahcolite. The principal products to be produced are sodium bicarbonate (baking <br /> soda) and sodium carbonate (soda ash). The Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project (Yankee Gulch <br /> Project) would occur at the Piceance Site, located in the BLM's White River Resource Area, on the <br />' Yankee Gulch Joint Venture Leases. The processing facilities at the Parachute Site would involve <br />modifying and refurbishing an existing, inactive industrial site at the Unocal Shale Oil Upgrade <br /> Facility. The two sites would be connected by an approximately 44-mile long pipeline corridor that <br />' would contain a product pipeline running from the Piceance Site to the Parachute Site and a parallel <br />return water pipeline. <br /> This Drafr EIS analyzes three alternatives for the Yankee Gulch Project: (1) the Proposed Action, <br /> (2) an Accelerated Development Alternative, and (3) the No Action Alternative. The Proposed <br /> Action involves developing a mining program for the first 30 years of operation on approximately <br /> 1,030 acres of the Yankee Gulch lease area. The initial recovery design basis would be 1.4 million <br /> tons per year (tpy) of nahcolite. Approximately I S wells would be developed each year afrer the <br />' initial start-up period. The Accelerated Development Alternative would increase production levels <br /> to 4 million tpy of nahcolite from the same mining panels as the Proposed Action. Approximately 45 <br /> wells would be developed each year afrer the start-up period, and the life of the project would be <br /> shortened to approximately 10 years. The No Action Alternative assumes the mining project would <br /> not proceed. <br />' EIS Contact: Larry Shults <br /> USDi Bureau of Land Management <br /> White River Resource Area <br />' 73544 Highway 64 <br /> Meeker, CO 81641 <br />t Date Draft EIS Filed with USEPA: January 8, 1999 <br />Dates of Public Hearings: February 10, 1999, 7 p.m., BLM Office, Meeker; <br />February 11, 1999, 7 p.m., Town Hall Council Chambers, Parachute <br />' Date by Which Comments are Due: Mazch 8, 1999. Written comments should be received by <br />close of business, 5:00 p.m. Please include your name and complete mailing address on all written <br />comments. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.