My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53629
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
MEMO DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
From
STEIGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LI <br />' E~ecutiue SummaN <br />in an approved landfill. Project operations wou]d comply with all relevant federal and state laws <br />regazding hazardous materials, and no significant impacts are expected. Impacts would be the <br />same for the Proposed Action and Accelerated Development Altemative. <br />' Health and Safety. The project could lead to increased risk of wildfire; employees would <br />receive training and all wildfires endangering life or property would be suppressed. Workplace <br />injuries would be similaz to those experienced in the heavy construction and oil and gas <br />' industries, and would be limited to American Soda employees and contractors. Methane gas is <br />not expected to occur at substantial levels, but a methane venting system would be incorporated <br />' into the piping system. Impacts would be the same for the Proposed Action and Accelerated <br />Development Altemative. <br />' No Action Alternative <br />Potential short-term, minor effects would include deer/vehicle collisions, hazardous material <br />' spills, and employee health and safety effects during closure of the test mine facility. The <br />pipeline would not be constructed and therefore, no cultural surveys would be performed and <br />additional knowledge of the azea would not be gained. Socioeconomic benefits of employment, <br />' earnings, tax revenues, and royalties would not be realized. The No Action Alternative would <br />also not meet the BLM's sodium management objective of facilitating the development of <br />sodium resources. <br />' AGENCY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE <br />The BLM Preferred Altemative is the Proposed Action. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ll <br /> <br />ES-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.