My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53539
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:41:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/1/1988
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Section Y - Decision to Require Revision <br />As mentioned above, no activity has occurred at the Seneca II-W Mine since <br />permit issuance. As such, the entire mining and reclamation sections are <br />outdated. Peabody will need to submit a revision modifying Tab 12 - <br />Operations (Yolumes VII and VIII) and Tab 13 - Postmine Land Use (Yolume IX) <br />simultaneously with the submittal to address permit stipulations 6, 11, and 12. <br />To date, the Division has not received an updated application form as <br />requested in the subsequently withdrawn Minor Revision No. 4. By <br />July 15, 1988 Peabody needs to submit an updated application form and updated <br />Tab 3 - Adjudication (Volume I) in duplicate. <br />Section VI -Bonding Summary <br />Peabody submitted corporate surety 926 44 03 issued by the National Fire <br />Insurance Company of Hartford for S2 ,646 ,300.00 on September 17, 1985. This <br />bond was accepted by the Division as executed by the Director on <br />October 7, 1985. Subsequently on December 8, 1986, the Division received a <br />rider making the United States of America a joint obligee with the State of <br />Colorado. This corporate surety is still found to be acceptable. <br />As there is no disturbance at the site since permit issuance, the <br />E2 ,646 ,300.00 bond is adequate to cover any reclamation that may be required. <br />With the updating of the operations plan as previously addressed in <br />Section Y of this document, the bonding calculations will also be reviewed <br />again. <br />7 524E <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.