Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcparanem ul NaWral Resources <br />I } I 1 Sherman 51 , Roum ? 15 <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />Denver, Columdo 80203 <br />Phone: (303J 856-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX:IIOJI BJ2-8106 $L <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MINING•SAFETY <br /> R~II Owens <br />March 30. 1999 eOVefn"r <br /> Greg E Watcher <br /> Exeturive Direcbr <br />Jeff Croll Michael 8. Long <br />Landmark Reclamation. Inc. D.visi°"Dhe~l°r <br />4901 S. Winderrnere <br />Littleton. CO 80102 <br />RE: Stipulations #6 and #7 for the Rimrock Mine, #C-89-074 <br />Dear Mr. Croll <br />During the last permit renewal, stipulations #6 and #7 were attached as conditions to the permit. <br />The stipulations were issued as follows: <br />Stipulation No. 6 <br />RIMROCK COAL COMPANY, LANDMARK RECLAMATION, INC., OR OTHER <br />PERSONS RESPONSIBLE SHALL PAY WITHIN 90 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION BY THE <br />DIVISION THAT STIPULATION NO. 7 HAS BEEN TERMINATED, ALL. OUTSTANDING <br />CIVIL PENALTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE OFFICE SURFACE MINING APPLICANT <br />VIOLATOR SYSTEM. IN LIEU OF PAYMENT, A DEMONSTRATION SATISFYING THE <br />STATE OF OKLAHOMA THAT LANDMARK RECLAMATION, INC. AND RIMROCK <br />COAL COMPANY ARE NOT LINKED TO THE ENTITY IN OKLAHOMA RESPONSIBLE <br />FOR PAYMENT, OR DID NOT HAVE CONTROL OF THE MINES IN OKLAHOMA AT <br />THE TIME THE VIOLATIONS WERE ISSUED, WOULD ALSO BE ADEQUATE. <br />Stipulation No. 7 <br />THE PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE OWNERSHIP <br />CONTROL RULES CHALLENGE BEFORE THE D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. <br />ON JANUARY 3l, 1997, THE COURT OF APPEALS RENDERED A DECISION <br />UNFAVORABLE TO OSM'S OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL REGULATIONS. ONCE ALL <br />AVENUES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW HAVE BEEN E`CHAUSTED, THIS PERMIT WILL BE <br />REVIEWED TO DETERMINE IF [T IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE <br />REQUIREMENTS. <br />