Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Alan Belt <br />November 9, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />the permitted area is inclusive of all areas potentially i~acted by mining, and <br />as the Long Draw springs fall outside of this area, the authority of the <br />regulatory agencies involved (BLM and Q+!<i~) with regard to special stipulation <br />"d" should not be extended to require that OWOC develop a water replaoe<oerrt. plan <br />specific to these resources. <br />CUVOC is sensitive to the concerns of the Stucker Mesa Domestic Water Co~any and <br />is hopeful that a reasonable fir-r,,,; ~ can be developed to resolve this issue <br />to the satisfaction of all parties. 4he primary concern of the Stucker Mesa <br />Domestic Water ~Y is understood to be the lack of definitive knowledge <br />regarding the ultimate source of water provided by the Upper Cabin Spring and the <br />correspondug unknown potential for subsidence to impact the rersanroe. Limited <br />hydrologic data fran the Upper Cabin Spring has been collected by Orchard Valley <br />Mine personnel since 1983. 'Ihe data is generally indicative of an <br />alluvial/wlluvial water system tharacterized by variable discharsJe related to <br />seasonal rec3~arge of the system. Water c~~al ity fray the spring is oafarable to <br />water quality typically encountered fran other alluvial/oolluvial arn,; fens in the <br />area. No anaralous geologic features have been identified in the area which <br />might suggest a ground~rater origin or connection for the spring. No areally <br />extensive water bearing formations are known to exist in the area. 'ihe Long Draw <br />drainage is, however, typified by several slumps arri landslide areas, <br />particularly on the northwest side of the drainage, which are indicative of <br />instability associated with saturated surficial deposits. <br />'Ihe Upper Cabin Spring is atypical as oa~ared to other monitored springs in the <br />permit area in that measurable flaws appear to occur year arowxi aryl flow rates <br />are relatively high. 'IY~e oc~aratively large drainage area (ammx;mately 440 <br />acres) and enhanced subs~sface collection system installed at this site likely <br />account for the consistent flow pattern observed. 'Ihe max,irnim flow recorded at <br />the iMrr~wr Cabin Spring by Orchard Valley is 10.6 gpn 71pa~+rpr3 on April 9, 1992. <br />'Ihe Stucker Mesa Domestic Water Company has indicated that flows as high as 20 <br />gpm have been measured. Flows in the ~~*- and fall months of 1991 and 1992 <br />typically ranged fran 3 gpm to 6 gpm. Efforts are underway to iag~rove the <br />monitoring capability at the Upper Cabin Spring by installing an in-line flow <br />meter. OOVCC is oaanitt:ed to oollectilg and providing aoan_ate data on spring <br />flow quantity arr] quality at the Upper Cabin Spring which can be used to docampnt <br />any potential irgaacts. <br />COVCC does not believe that mining currently proposed within the West Roatcap <br />Creek watershed constitutes a significant threat to either the quantity or <br />quality of water emanating fran the Long Draw springs at issue. Significant aryl <br />potentially disruptive surface subsidence effects within the OOVCC permit area <br />are anticipated only iIl areas where minim occurs below less than 800 feet of <br />overburden. Consequently, buffer zones affording only limited coal extraction <br />within certain areas of lease COC-37210 OOIItd1r1].Tg renewable re.,au'ce lards dr7d <br />less than 800 feet of overl~nrden were defined within the permit area to protect <br />surface resan•ces and prevent subsidence. As a frsther resour~c,~e-protective <br />me~~~re, the western brnurlary of lease COC-37210 was wluntarily moved east to <br />its present location in cooperation with and in response to ooncvrns wined bi' <br />