Laserfiche WebLink
-11- <br />• - <br />IV. Geology (2.09.5, 2.04.6) <br />The area to be affected over the Life of the operation is part of the Bookcliffs <br />coal field which is an outcropping of the Mesaverde Group. The Bookcliffs coal <br />field is situated on the southern rim of the Uinta Basin. The structural rim of <br />the basin falls along the crest line of the Uncompahgre uplift, some 30 miles to <br />the south. The coal seams of the project area occur in the Mount Garfield <br />Formation of the Mesaverde Group. For purposes of description of the Localized <br />structure in the general vicinity of the permit area, the Bookcliffs coal field <br />is characterized by a monoclinical structure with the strata dipping gently to <br />the northeast. The surface geology of the project area is mapped in Exhibit 13 <br />of the application. The general stratigraphy and structure is depicted in the <br />cross-section and geologic column of Exhibit 14 of the application. <br />Four coal zones containing minable seams outcrop along the face of the Baokcliffs <br />in Colorado. The stratigraphically highest zone has been named the "Carbonera <br />coal zone". Two or three seams are usually present in this zone. About 60 feet <br />below the Carbonera coal zone is the Cameo coal zone. One or two seams are comrranly <br />present in this zone. Where there are two coal seams, the interval between them is <br />30 feet or less. The Cameo zone is thick, laterally extensive, and the most <br />productive coal zone in the Bookcliffs field. The Lower Cameo seam immediately <br />overlies the Rollins Sandstone. The interval between the base of the Cameo coal <br />zone and the base of the Palisade coal zone, the next lower coal zone, ranges from <br />200 to 450 feet, being greater in the east than in the west. The Sego Sandstone <br />underlines the Palisade zone and is a regional formation correlation marker. The <br />interval between the base of the Palisade coal zone and the base of the Anchor <br />croal zone, the lowest of the four, ranges from 45 to 60 feet. <br />Of the four coal seams present in the Bookcliffs coal field, only the Cameo 'B' <br />and 'C' seams are recognized as being minable in the permit area. The Cameo 'B' <br />seam is presently being mined at the Roadside mine on the east side of the Colorado <br />River and at the Cameo No. 1 mine on the west side. The Cameo 'B' seam varies in <br />thickness from a minimum of four (4) feet to a maximum of eleven (11) feet in the <br />permit area. The minable seam averages about six (6) feet in thickness. The coal <br />has been classified as high volatile bituminous characterized by low sulfur and a <br />anderately high ash content. <br />Further information on the geology of the permit area can be found in Sections <br />2.04.5 and 2.04.6 of Volumes I and V <br />The analyses of the roof, floor, coal and refuse materials in Appendix O of Volume <br />V indicate that the materials are generally high in iron (Fe), and have a high pH <br />and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). The high iron level should not pose a <br />significant problem because iron is relatively insoluble at the high pH values <br />characteristically found in the materials. In addition, the sodic nature of the <br />materials is not a significant problem. The sodium levels are similar to those <br />found in the soils of the area and much lower than those found in the .exposed strata, <br />such as Mancos shale, which outcrops in the general vicinity of the mine. The <br />high sodium content would not affect the plant growth characteristics of the materials, <br />since these sodium quantities are not toxic to plants, but rather destroy the <br />structure of soils, particularly in soils of predominantly clay texture. The result <br />of this breakdown is a decrease in the infiltration rate, thus a decrease in water <br />available for plant growth. However, the refuse material, which is the only waste <br />material which may be subject to revegetation activities, is croarse textured <br />(70+~ sand size), thus there should be no problems. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br /> <br />