My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL53075
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL53075
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:44 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:18:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/21/1998
Doc Name
REPORTED OUT OF CONTAINMENT CYANIDE SPILLS SAN LUIS PROJECT M-88-112
From
DMG
To
BRUCE HUMPHRIES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />B99 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural ReSOUrCeS <br />1 } I l Sherman St., Roam 215 <br />Denver, Colorado HO203 <br />f hone (30i1 Nbb-3567 <br />FAn 11(1 it tli~ tl106 <br />May 2l, 1998 <br />~'.. <br />~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Ror Romrr <br />To: H. Bruce Humphries cover^nr <br />/tl lames 5. Lnchhead <br />~/ 4 Erecwi~r Duerlor <br />From: James Dillie /~, <br />Michael B. Loop <br />Divivon Direanr <br />Re: Reported Out-of-Containment Cyanide Spills, San Luis Project, M-88-112 <br />Per your request, following is a brief description of all the reported out-of-containment cyanide spills a[ <br />the San Luis Project: <br />1. October 1, 1993 - a leak (treated and recycled process water) occurred at a join~.ed pipe between <br />the process water storage tank and the tailings impoundment in an unlined V ditch. It vas estimated that <br />3,000 gallons leaked out. The water flowed down the ditch to the tailings facility. Lab results showed <br />.16 ppm total and WAD cyanide in the process water. The Board did not find a violation. However, <br />BMRI was required to submit a permit revision (TR-17) to address the problem. The revision satisfied <br />the Division's concerns regarding past, and possible future, spills in and around the process water <br />pipeline. Also, as an additional precaution, BMRI submitted TR-20 to address possible: spills at the <br />process water tank. This involved constructing a concrete containment structure around the tank. TR-20 <br />was approved. <br />2. April 8, 1996 - a high pressure leak in a tailings disposal pipeline valve. The high pressure leak <br />cut through the drainage layer, the 60-mil geomembrane and the 12 inch clay liner. The approximate <br />water loss was 650 gallons and the estimated amount of cyanide leakage was 0.03 pounds. The operator <br />was required to repair the valve and pipe; excavate all the contaminated soil and place it in the tailings <br />facility; bring in fresh material (install in 4-6 inch lifts and compact); and replace the geomembrane <br />(extrusion weld and vacuum test). The operator completed the corrective actions on 4-12-96. No <br />violation was found. <br />3. November 25, 1996 -corroded holes in two slurry tanks leaked cyanide laced water into the <br />sediments below the tanks. After cleaning the slurry tanks, the operator found several sizeable holes in <br />[he bottom of two (out of eight) slurry tanks. The operator notified [he Division the day after discovering <br />the holes. After inspecting the tanks, the Division decided to have the operator remove: the tank bottoms <br />so the soils could be excavated and tested. Several soil samples were collected and tested at various <br />depths. Cyanide was detected in the soil down to a depth of 6 feet. The Division instnlcted the operator <br />to remove all the contaminated soil and place it in the tailings facility since this would be one of the <br />corrective actions required by the Board. The operator excavated soils down to IS feet under each tank. <br />Cyanide was not detected at the ]5 foot level. All [he contaminated soil was placed in the tailings facility <br />and the pits underneath the tanks were backfilled with inert Santa Fe material. The Board did find a <br />violation but, since the problem was already resolved, the Board only assessed a $100.00 civil penalty. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.