My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL52846
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL52846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:35 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/1/2005
Doc Name
Vegetation Sampling Memo
From
Janet Binns
To
Byron Walker
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cover and aze valuable components of the community, but they aze not included in the WPD values for the comparison to the <br />reclamation standazd. Review of the baseline data do not End sub-shrub species counted in the baseline woody stem values. <br />Overall the proposed sampling plan agrees with the Regulations, Guidelines and Edna Permit Commitments with the <br />following exceptions: <br />Transect length for Cover and Diversity data collection needs to agree with the Edna permit (page 4.423) <br />commitment of LOOM long. <br />2. The appropriate adequary formula needs to be applied to the data as defined in the Division's "Guideline Regazding <br />Selected Coal Mine Bond Release Issues" (Apri118, 1995, pages 20 and 21). If the data show that the sampled <br />parameter is less that the reclamation standazd, please use the adequary formula shown on page 20 of the referenced <br />guideline. If the reclaimed azea sample data equal or exceed the reclamation success standard, the adequacy formula <br />shown on page 21 of the referenced guideline is applicable. <br />3. Sub-shrub spedes should not be included in the stem counts for Woody Stem Density reclamation success <br />determinations. <br />The Division appreciates the operator submitting reclamation success sampling proposals to the Division fox review prior to <br />data collection. This practice allows for concerns with the sampling plan to be corrected prior to the data collection in the <br />field. When P&M knows of the planned sampling schedule, please apprise the Division of the timing of the sampling. The <br />Division often attempts to observe the state of the mine and vegetation concurrent with the sampling program, and if <br />possible, meet the sampling crew on site. If questions arise in the field these questions are ofren able to be addressed by <br />Division personnel at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.