My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL52738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL52738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:02:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/15/1992
Doc Name
SUMMARY OF GEC RECLAMATION PLANS AND REVISIONS
From
MLRD
To
STEVE RENNER
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" ".':.~ . <br /> <br />Memo - Steve Renner - 2 - April 15, 1992 <br />J. Irrigation would be implemented if severe drought conditions warranted it. <br />(9/84) <br />K. Weed and pest control would be implemented. (9/84) <br />L. Although not mentioned in plan, reseeded areas would need to be fenced. <br />(3/92) <br />M. A vegetative sampling program would be implemented. (9/84) <br />N. NPDES and APCD permits would be maintained. (9/84) <br />0. Redressing of gullys and rills forming to depths of over 9" would occur. <br />(9/84) <br />P. A grazing management plan would be submitted once vegetation was <br />successfully established. (9/84) <br />5. Important Specifics: <br />A. The highwalls in the East Pit would be regraded to 2H:1V. This would <br />include having the highwalls reduced. (9/84) <br />B. Stockpile #2 would be eliminated, but Stockpile #1 would remain. It's <br />crown would be leveled to an elevation of 6,200, which would leave it at <br />forty-five feet in height and approximately 2,000 feet in circumference at <br />its base. Stockpile ~1's remaining side slopes would also be left at <br />2H:1V. (9/84) <br />C. The East Pit would be configured to handle the 10-year, 24-hour storm <br />event, with a longitudinal channel gradient of no steeper than 15y. (9/84) <br />D. Subsoils would be replaced to a depth of two feet over all disturbances, <br />with topsoil being replaced to a depth of four inches. (9/84) <br />E. The cost for reclaiming the East Pit would come to $445,000, as estimated <br />by Carl Mount in 1989. However, this cost estimate did not include <br />measures for ensuring erosional stability on steep slopes <br />(e.g. jute netting), and was not adjusted downward for cost savings due to <br />the highwall being used for a portion of the East Pit fill. The cost <br />estimate also did not account for any indirect costs (mob/demob, contactor <br />profit, etc.), nor for maintenance of the site following reseeding. <br />F. The total cost for reclamation of the entire site is estimated at <br />$675,000. This is based on the 3445,000 East Pit figure plus estimates <br />derived in February 1992 for reclamation in Section 24 (560,742), <br />additional reclamation in Section 30 (329,762), mobilization/demobilization <br />of equipment (325,000) and 207. indirect costs ($112,100), rounded up from <br />5672,604. <br />DIH/ern <br />2215E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.