GENERAL52614 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On page 2.05.4-5R the applicant makes reference to having done sampling programs for some of these areas to determine the best available plant growth- medium. No reference is made to the location of the sampling results in the application, and they could not be located in the application. Therefore, the Division deems it necessary to impose the following stipulation, STIPULATION N0. 2 THE DIVISION DIRECTS EMPIRE ENERGY CORPORATION, WITHIN 90 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, TO SUBMIT TO THE DIVISION THE RESULTS OF THE SAMPLING PROGRAM FOR ALL OVERBURDEN PROPOSED TO BE USED FOR PLANT GROWTH MEDIA. BASED UPON THE RESULTS OF THESE STUDIES, AND THE UTILIZATION OF ANY PROPOSED SOIL AMENDMENTS, THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE TO THE DIVISION'S SATISFACTION THAT THE PROPOSED OVERBURDEN IS AN ACCEPTABLE PLANT GROWTH MEDIA. With the acceptance of the above stipulation, the Division finds the topsoil sections of Empire Energy Corporation's proposed mining and reclamation plan to be in comp]iance for the Eagle No, 5, 5A and No. 6 Mines. XI. Vegetation - Rules 2.04.10, 2.05.4(2)(e) and 4.15 Pre-mine vegetation information is provided in Section 2.04.10. Additional information is provided in Exhibit 14, Supplemental Vegetation Information. Vegetation communities are shown on Map 20-Vegetation Map. Section 2.05 (pages 2.05.4-5R through 2.05.4-23Ra) describe the revegetation methodology, while pages 2.05.4-24R through 2.05.4-33Ra discuss the revegetation standards for each type of disturbed area. The Williams Fork Strip Pit revegetation plans and revegetation success criteria are given in Exhibit 24, Williams Fork Strip Pit Reclamation PT an. The Reclamation Plan Map (Map 29) indicates the planned post-mine uses (vegetation types) and the reference areas for the reclaimed areas. A vegetation inventory was conducted at the Eagle Mine Complex in July 1981. The operator sampled three undisturbed big sagebrush stands adjacent to the surface disturbance. The vegetation sample areas were similar in aspect, elevation and soils to the disturbed areas. The information collected in that study is located in Section 2.04.10 (pages 2.04.10-2 through 2.04.10-24). No threatened and/or endangered plant species were identified within the disturbed area during the vegetation inventory. Roughly one-third of the permit area is covered by croplands. Empire Energy Corporation has divided the croplands into two categories: 1) irrigated hayfields in the Williams Fork River bottom areas, and 2) dryland wheat, found on cleared hillsides which were once sage-dominated. Productivity data is provided for the irrigated hayfields on Table 69 (page 2.05.4-27). Wheat production is given in Table 70, page 2.05,4-30, Empire Energy Corporation is proposing to reclaim the surface disturbed areas to rangeland/wildlife habitat, hayfields and dryland wheatfields. An adeouate plan for revegetation has been presented. Several revegetation success standards have been proposed by the applicant for the different disturbed areas. -50-