Laserfiche WebLink
the potential for depletions to the aquifer systems and can cause both ,surface <br />and ground water quality degradation. This section will explore the impacts <br />on the hydrologic regime by of the underground mining being conducted in and <br />being proposed for the Eagle No. 5 and No. 6 Mines. <br />It is important to note that the mining which could generate the major <br />hydrologic impacts from the Eagle No. 5 Mine has already occurred at this <br />time. The No. 5 mine is now progressing updip in the Williams Fork Mountains <br />away from areas where the Williams Fork and Yampa stream/alluvial systems were <br />undermined. Operations are in the planning stage for the Eagle No. 6 mine <br />which will largely underlie the No. 5 Mine, at least during the first five <br />permit years. <br />Ground Water <br />Some depletion of water from the local bedrock aquifers is expected to result <br />from these mining operations but, as discussed below, this depletion is not <br />considered significant. The discharge of water from the mines will affect <br />surface water quality, but not to the extent that use would be limited. <br />Assuming that the portals are properly sealed when the mines are abandoned and <br />allowed to flood, some effects on water quality in the Williams Fork alluvium <br />is anticipated as a result of discharge of mine water through subcrops of the <br />"E" and "F" seams. The magnitude of this impact is problematical and will be <br />discussed in this section. <br />Empire Energy Corporation has provided a discussion of the probable hydrologic <br />consequences of the Eagle No. 5 and No. 6 mines to the ground water regime. <br />The projected impacts are as follows: <br />1. Depletion of aquifers overlying and underlying the coal seams as <br />well as depletion of the stream/alluvial system of the Williams Fork <br />River; <br />2. Depletion, through use, of water in the Trout Creek sandstone; and, <br />3. Degradation of ground and surface water quality through mine water <br />discharges. <br />The Eagle No. 5 mine requires pumping to prevent flooding of the mine <br />workings. The discharge rates of this mine water to the surface are monitored <br />on a weekly basis and averaged between 600 and 800 gpm during 1985. Based an <br />modeling, Empire Energy Corporation has estimated that combined inflow into <br />the No. 5 and No. 6 Mines will range hetween 860 and 1070 gpm by: the end of <br />the first permit term. This inflow will increase in subsequent years as the <br />No. 6 Mine is expanded. The operator's worst case estimate of total maximum <br />inflow into the No. 5 and No. 6 Mines is 2,490 gpm by the 20th permit year. <br />Empire Energy Corporation has conducted annual inflow studies of the Eagle No. <br />5 Mine since 1983. In these studies the sources of mine inflows are <br />identified as specifically as possible under existing operating conditions, <br />the individual rates of inflow are measured where practical, and the total is <br />the sum of these inflows. The major sources of mine inflow are two of three <br />normal faults encountered in the Two West Mains. The T985 mine study reported <br />that approximately 308 gpm inflow occurs by means of these faults. This <br />_29_ <br />