Laserfiche WebLink
alluvial valley floor is the capacity <br />the regional practice. Subirrigation <br />secondary to flood irrigation. <br />for flood irrigation, coinciding with <br />may also occur, but it is considered <br />The No. 5 Mine and associated facilities were established on the Williams Fork <br />River valley floor during the early 1970s. Mine entries were developed into <br />the "F" coal seam which outcropped above the valley floor. A71 surface <br />facilities were constructed near the portal entries on the valley floor. The <br />No. 5 Mine and proposed No. 6 Mine will utilize the original portal entries <br />and surface facilities as well as the surface facilities added to the Empire <br />Energy operation during 1981 and 1982. The No. 5 Mine mains extend across the <br />Williams Fork alluvial valley floor. The mains of the No. 6 Mine, which are <br />developed in the underlying "E" Seam, will directly underly the No. 5 Mine <br />mains. Subsidence monitoring to date has shown no impacts to the alluvial <br />valley floor due to the development mining underneath the Williams Fork <br />alluvial valley floor. <br />Upon cessation of mining, the pumps which drain the mine of water will be shut <br />off and the mine workings allowed to fill. <br />In the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of tfie permit application, the <br />applicant has projected impacts that could occur to the Williams Fork alluvial <br />water quality due to seepage from the flooded mine workings into the Williams <br />Fork alluvium. This scenerio assumes that the coal seams are in direct <br />hydrologic communication with the alluvium of the Williams Fork River, Upon <br />flooding of the mines, a head is expected to occur which would allow recharge <br />of the alluvium by the mine water. The mine water presently pumped from the <br />No. 5 Mine is high in sodium content. Using Darcy's Law, the applicant has <br />projected a net impact of the seepage into the alluvial valley floor to <br />increase the SAR level from 1.9 to 5.2. Although the SAR is projected to <br />increase significantly, the level is still below that considered hazardous to <br />crop development. The increased SAR would impact alluvial water in contact <br />with the coal seams, specifically water available through subirrigation. The <br />essential hydrologic function of this AYF is flood irrigation, as supplied by <br />the surface water of the Williams Fork River, As the Williams Fork stream <br />water is not projected to be significantly impacted by the mining operation, <br />the essential function of flood irrigation will not be impaired, <br />This essential hydrologic function, flood irrigation, will be reestablished <br />upon completion of reclamation activities. The surface facilities will be <br />removed, topsoil replaced, and the site seeded with the rangeland or the <br />pasture land mixture, where applicable. The pasture lands will then be flood <br />irrigated. The rangeland and marshy areas will not be irrigated, <br />Yampa River Alluvial Valley Floors <br />The Eagle No. 9 Mine has undermined portions of the Big Bottom alluvial valley <br />floor (AYF). The Eagle No. 5 Mine has mined and will be mining-in areas <br />beneath or hydrologically adjacent to two alluvial valley floors (AVF's) along <br />the Yampa River, the Big Bottom and the Round Bottom alluvial vaitey floors. <br />Each of these alluvial valley floors are discussed separately, along with the <br />potential impacts of mining. <br />_17_ <br />