Laserfiche WebLink
<br />required by Bankruptcy Rule 4001. Accordingly, the Debtor <br />believes that the scope of its notice has been sufficient. <br />Safe Harbor under Bankruotcv Code Section 364fe). <br />Section 364(e) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a so-called "safe <br />harbor" for entities lending postpetition to debtors in <br />possession. That section states <br />The reversal or modification on appeal of an <br />authorization under this section to obtain <br />credit or incur debt, or of a grant under <br />this section of a priority lien, does not <br />affect the validity of any debt so incurred, <br />or any priority or lien so granted, to an <br />entity that extended such credit in good <br />faith, whether or not such entity knew of the <br />pendency of the appeal, unless such <br />authorization and the incurring of such debt, <br />or the granting of such priority lien, were <br />stayed pending appeal. <br />This section protects entities who extend credit to a <br />debtor in "good faith." The financing transaction between the <br />Debtor and Colorado National Bank has been negotiated and <br />completed in good faith. The terms and conditions were <br />negotiated at arms length and the purpose of the lending is to <br />allow the Debtor to comply with its reclamation duties. The <br />financing transaction is not intended to accomplish a purpose <br />antithetical to the Bankruptcy Code. In re EDC Holding Co., 676 <br />F.2d 945 (7th Cir. 1982) (postpetition financing not extended in <br />good faith where lender knew of improper purpose of loan). <br />5 <br />