Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III` <br />999 <br />STATE OF CO~UKADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DCU,l flmunl UI N.IIU rJ Rl`SnnrLfS ~~~~~~ <br />I f l 1 Shuman SL, Room '_ 1 5 <br />Denver, Columdu 8U!0 4 <br />I'hnnc' I lOli 86L- f ih? <br />FAX IP1418L'~81111~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />DATE: September 12, 1997 ~~ Roy Romer <br />' '~~ Governor <br />lames 5. lrKhhead <br />TO: Dan Mathews // Ereiunve Direciur <br />~_ Michael B Lonti <br />FROM• Jim Pendleton Di,nsinn Director <br />RE: Roadside ne - Re se Disposal Pile - Piezometer #307 <br />(Permit No: C-81-041) <br />I have reviewed the information which you sent via facsimile to my attention. I understand your <br />concern regards the status of piezometer #307, installed on the second bench of the refuse <br />disposal pile at the Roadside mine. It is my understanding Larry Reschke informed you, during <br />your recent inspection of the pile, that this piezometer has been unusable (incapable of entry with <br />the m-scope water table depth probe) for the majority of its life. You have requested my opinion <br />whether this piezometer needs to be replaced by the operator. <br />In 1994, a series of thirty piezometers were required to be installed within the refuse pile after <br />seeps had developed above the second facial bench. The Division wanted the operator to <br />determine whether this seep was the expression of a perched seep along the surface of the bench, <br />or rather an indication that the entire pile was saturated to that elevation. The assemblage of <br />piezometers have satisfactorily demonstrated to the Division that the seep was an expression of <br />a perched water bearing lens within the pile, probably resulting from the high compaction of a <br />surface exposed to truck fire traffic for an extended period of time. Further, as the pile's <br />thickness increased and the upslope diversion of surface drainage was improved, the flow from <br />these seeps diminished. Finally, there has been no evidence of renewed instability of the refuse <br />saturated by the seepage. <br />No other of the thirty piezometers has indicated any potential problematic ground water <br />elevations. Nor has the refuse pile demonstrated any slope stability problems. I do not believe <br />it would be warranted at this time to require the operator to replace piezometer #307. I <br />recommend that we require the operator to continue to attempt to monitor piezometer #307. A <br />changed condition in the future might warrant a more in depth reconsideration of the situation. <br />cc: Larry Routten <br />doe: M:\COALUAP\piez307.wp5 <br />JP/JP <br />