Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />with an apparent fault zone during development of the Second Right <br />entries in early 1988. An extensive discussion of the geology and <br />hydrology of this water flow is made on pages 2.04-7 to 20 of the renewal <br />application document. <br />An inventory of water wells was made by the operator for the permit and <br />adjacent area. Data from this survey appears in Tables 7, 8, and 9 and <br />in Exhibits 6 and 8 of the renewal application document. Location of <br />these wells may be found on Map 7. <br />Asa result of Stipulations Nos. 4, 5, and 6 to the original permit, <br />springs and seeps within the permit and adjacent area were identified by <br />the operator and monitored fora limited period of time during the first <br />permit term. Data from this survey appears in Tables 11 and 12 of the <br />renewal application; monitoring results are incorporated in Exhibit 10. <br />Stipulations Nos. 4, 5, and 6 of the original permit have been satisfied. <br />Stipulation No. 7 of the original permit required a map of all wells <br />within one mile of the permit area together with an assessment of the <br />probable hydrologic consequences of mining on these we1]s. This <br />stipulation has been satisfied. <br />The Quaternary age alluvial deposits along the Purgatoire River contain <br />ground water. These alluvial deposits are a major ground water source in <br />the region. Most of the domestic, livestock, and irrigation wells <br />identified in the permit and adjacent areas are completed in the alluvium <br />adjacent to the Purgatoire River. The quality and quantity of alluvial <br />ground water in this aquifer is dependent on the quality and quantity of <br />water in the river and the domestic, agricultural, and industrial <br />activities on, and adjacent to the alluvial body. <br />Asa result of Stipulation 8 of the original permit, investigations were <br />made of Ciruela and Apache Canyon to determine the existence of alluvial <br />aquifers. Neither canyon was found to contain such deposits. No <br />determination was, howr:ver, made for Santistevan Canyon which does <br />contain a perennial stream. Since the proposed mine plan for the renewal <br />term includes longwall mining under Santistevan Canyon, Stipulation 8 is <br />continued, as regards Santistevan Canyon, in order to satisfy Rule <br />2.04.7 (1 ). <br />Stipulation No. 8 <br />PRIOR TO SECONDARY OR RETREAT MINING AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE MINE, THE <br />PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC SURVEY IDENTIFYING ALL ALLW IAL <br />AQUIFERS IN, OR ADJACENT TO THE PERMIT AREA (EXCEPT FOR THE PURGATOIRE <br />RIVER ALLW IAL AQUIFER WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN IDENTIFIED). THIS SURVEY <br />SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE, HORIZONTAL <br />EXTENT, WATER USE, AND QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF GROUND WATER AS REQUIRED <br />UNDER RULE 2.04.7(1). THE PERMITTEE SHALL ALSO PROVIDE A DISCUSSION OF <br />THE PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES OF MINING UPON TNOSE ALLW IAL <br />AQUIFERS IDENTIFIED. <br />Asa result of the satisfaction of Stipulations 4, 5, 6, and 7 to the <br />original permit and with the acceptance of Stipulation 8, the proposed <br />operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />-10- <br />