Laserfiche WebLink
Michael Long, Director <br />December 22, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />Rancho Escondido were platted, and the entire Rancho Escondido area <br />was zoned "Ranchette", prior to 1978, as shown by Raton West's <br />Exhibit 12. Further, land owner notification must be made to <br />current landowners. <br />5. A closely related concern which requires investigation is <br />that we believe that Basin is not able to locate its underground <br />workings relative to Rancho Escondido lots and structures, to an <br />accuracy of better than 300 feet, and that all of its maps, <br />including the MSHA ventilation map, appear to be substantially <br />outdated. This raises issues regarding subsidence monitoring and <br />planning as well as mine safety issues. <br />A date which is significant is that Basin and its predecessors <br />acquired the coal reserves accessed by the Golden Eagle Mine at <br />times when the surface could have been purchased very cheaply, <br />completely avoiding the mineral owner-surface owner conflict which <br />exists today. <br />As stated in our December 2 letter, the relationship between <br />the surface owner and the severed mineral owner is governed by two <br />specific statutes in addition to the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Act. The first of these is CRS 34-33-121 Surface <br />effects of underground coal mining, and the other is CRS 34-48-106 <br />Security for mining under surface. Any assertion that the latter <br />statute does not pertain to coal is negated by the fact that all of <br />the annotated cases are coal cases, all of which were favorable to <br />the surface owner. Basin Resources is in violation of both <br />statutes as far as protection of the surface owner is concerned. <br />The Division does not have the option of ignoring either statute. <br />We believe that Raton west is entitled to relief under the <br />cited Colorado law regardless of applicable federal law. However, <br />the position of the Office of Surface Mining is consistent with our <br />views, as shown by the discussion at the beginning of their <br />September 24, 1993 proposed rules (Raton West Exhibit 29). While <br />these rules are still in the public comment stage until January 24, <br />1994, they will likely be adopted in their present or slightly <br />modified format in the very near future. <br />We also believe that no further rule making by the Board is <br />needed in order to require the security/bonding and other actions <br />by Basin which we request. In the event the Division concludes <br />that rule making would be necessary, then the new permit which <br />Basin is seeking for the Golden Eagle Mine cannot be issued until <br />such rule making is complete, otherwise the Board would be <br />countenancing an evasion and violation of the cited statutes. <br />~~a, u,~rm, x~w ~ er~m <br />