My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51603
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/2/2005
Doc Name
2004 Vegetation Monitoring Report
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabody Twentymile Coal Company <br />2004 Fish Creek AVF Riparian Vegetation Monitoring <br />staked in the field with steel T-posts, numbered with aluminum tags and GPS <br />surveyed. <br />Due to extensive agricultural use at this site and the end goal of establishing the <br />effects of subsidence, factors used to define community types were modified to <br />better suite this study. Forest Service defined community types outlined in the <br />GTR are based on vegetation communities common in natural riparian areas in <br />which vegetation has not been significantly altered by anthropogenic activities <br />(i.e. agriculture). The area to be surveyed at Twentymile Coal Company has <br />been heavily influenced by agricultural activities and therefore, the native <br />vegetation community types identified and used by the USFS are not applicable. <br />Furthermore, the Forest Service methodology focuses on ascertaining the <br />effectiveness of management practices in order to draw comparisons with <br />potential natural communities that could exist in an ideal healthy riparian <br />complex for a given area. Since monitoring at Twentymile Coal Company <br />focuses-on composition and distribution, rather than estimated potentials, the <br />vegetation community descriptions and methodologies have been modified to fit <br />this site's conditions and evaluation purposes. <br />To facilitate implementation and achieve consistent results on an annual basis, <br />vegetation community sub-types were developed in 2003 based on dominant <br />vegetation characteristics, while ignoring minor species components. These sub- <br />types were then consolidated into community types based on shared inherent <br />qualities (Table 1). For example, sparsely vegetated mud flats and eroded stream <br />banks may have Carex species, Juncus species, or a combination of both. Since <br />both species are strongly influenced by the effects of seasonal flooding and their <br />proximity to ground water, both were included in the "Riparian" community <br />type. Likewise, smooth brome (Bromus Inermis) and slender wheatgrass (Elymus <br />trachycaulus) dominated grasslands both occur in similar ecological settings at <br />this site, so they were grouped together in the "improved Pasture - Mesic° <br />vegetation community type. Two additions were made to the 2003 classification <br />system to more accurately describe transect composition in 2004. Specifically, the <br />2004 monitoring efforts incorporated a "Riparian -Open Water' classification, <br />and the "Big Sage' community type was changed to "Sage Brush" to integrate a <br />new "Black Sage' (Artemisia nova) community sub-type. <br />Vegetation community composition was determined by traversing permanently <br />established transects and recording the number of paces for each community <br />sub-type encountered. The sub-types were grouped into community types and <br />Habitat Management, Inc. Page 2 10/8/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.