My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:47:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/29/2000
Doc Name
ROADSIDE MINE RECLAMATION STATUS AND POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY HAZARDS PN C-81-041
From
DMG
To
DAVID BERRY
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~, r.. <br />tunnel. Also, the geomorphic consequences of wrapping the final diversion channel along the <br />upper perimeter of the Roadside Refuse Pile may deserve further consideration. <br />b) Handling of seepage water in ricinity of South Portals. Water from pre-law mine workings . <br />discharges seasonally in the immediate vicinity of the South Mine Portals. A plan to ensure that <br />seepage will not compromise stability of the bacldrll in the vicinity would appear to be warranted. <br />Also, prior to bacldlling of the portals, the operator needs to demonstrate that there is no potential <br />for water to build up behind the South Portal seals, to the extent that the integrity of the seals <br />would be compromised <br />c) The Roadside refuse area was temporarily stabilized in the 1980's by grading the outslopes and <br />covering with 6 inches of soil, followed by seeding The flat top of the pile has been used az a <br />storage yard Final reclamation will require stripping of the current soil cover, sloping the top of <br />the pile, installation of drainage tertaces, installation of pemtartent diversions, replacement of an <br />18 inch soil cover,.and revegetation The reclamation plan indiptes that sufficient suitable soil <br />material could be recovered during reclamation Crom beneath the paved parking areas of the lower <br />bench for refuse cover. I think the documentation of the presence of sufficient suitable material in <br />that location may be lacking, and that an alternative or supplemental borrow area may need to be <br />identified. <br />d) Recent monitoring of revegetated areas, as well az more casual observation, has indicated poor <br />establishment of hefiaceous perennials in some areas. Specifically, the south Caring scopes of the <br />CRDA-2 refuse area are stabilized by a dense stand of fourwing saltbush and a few other shrubs, <br />but the slopes are essentially devoid of perennial herbaceous vegetation. Likewise, major portions <br />of the North Decline are dominated by cheatgrass, with minimal perennial herbaceous cover. <br />1Nerseeding with perennial grasses and forts, and/or other augmentive efforts may be warranted <br />to ensure ultimate revegetation success to allow for final bond release within a reasonable time <br />period. <br />Environmental/Public Safety Hazards <br />I don't believe there are any imminent safety or environmental hazards that require immediate <br />attention However, I believe the adequacy of the current minewater disclutrge system is questionable. <br />Should the operator cease to monitor water levels at Well N-1 and cease to monitor and regulate <br />discharge flow from Ou[fall 002, we would need to ensure that those functions are performed. Without <br />this periodic monitoring and maintenance, and with no modification of the existing discharge system, <br />there is potential for uncontrolled discharge, possibly ptastrophic, from the Northwest Intake. <br />Geomorphic questions regarding the CRDA-2 upper diversion and top of pile topography need to be <br />resolved and prudent design implemented during final reclamation. My concern is that, with the <br />current configuration of ditch and pile, a 100 year event type cloudburst could cause large scale <br />erosion of the refuse pile, such as occurred in a similar environment at the Fruits Mine. Similarly, we <br />need to ensure that a geomorphically appropriate permanent design is developed and implemented for <br />the Coal Creek permanent diversion segment. The most significant concern wish respect to this issue <br />would be the potential for the channel to alter its course at the upper end of the diversion segment, <br />possibly eroding into the tce of the CRDA-t refuse pile. <br />As is the case with any mine, should the operator walk away, wnditions will deteriorate and problems <br />will develop unless we ensure that necessary monitoring and maintenance work is performed on a <br />regular basis. Drainage related problems requiring quick response are moss likely to oavr during the <br />monsoon season, July through early October most years, when cloudburst type storms are most likely. <br />Wit. 5 . mc.~r a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.