My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51205
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:36:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977285
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/20/1996
Doc Name
DMO DETERMINATION SUNDAY MINE M-77-285
From
DMG
To
H BRUCE HUMPHRIES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MEMO to B. Humphries/J. ens • <br />June 11 1996 - EFN's DMO Determinations <br />Page 2 <br />EFN submitted a packet of information, along with a second request for exemption, in support of <br />DMO exemption on August 3, 1995, during a meeting with the Division. The contents of the <br />submittal include an overview and introduction section, the relevant available information section, <br />a potential risk [o human health or environment section, a summary and conclusior~s section, a <br />reference section and several maps and exhibits. <br />In the overview and introduction section, EFN says "Section 34-32-112.5(2) of the Colorado Mined <br />Land Reclamation Act provides that the Board shall exempt operations from designation, if acid- <br />or toxic-producing materials will not be used, stored, or disturbed in quantities ~.ufficient.to <br />adversely affect any person, any property or the environment". EFN also states that the available <br />information in this submittal will show that toxic-forming materials are not exposed or disturbed <br />at the Sunday and West Sunday mine properties in quantities sufficient to adversely a;Ffect human <br />health, property, or the environment. EFN states that the available data shows that the only <br />constituents of concern are uranium and radium, that radioactivity levels are higher in undisturbed <br />rock outcrops in areas around the mines, that EFN is unaware of any other material onsite that <br />would contain detrimental amounts of chemical constituents under the purview of Rule 1, and that <br />no drainage of surface water will occur at the mines. <br />The relevant available information section describes where EFN's information was ot~tained. In <br />addition, EFN provided narratives regazding the fmal land use of the mine site, the potential human <br />exposure, the wildlife species (which El N contends will not be affected, because the LiOW found <br />that the impact of mining activities on wildlife would be minor), the potential impacts of exposure <br />on wildlife (EFN says there is a higher potential risk of radioactive exposure from the rock <br />outcrops surrounding the mine properties, because the radioactive constituents appear to be more <br />highly concentrated), the radiometric survey (this is a qualitative measurement of radi~~activity at <br />the West Sunday waste dump and an exposed rock outcrop neaz the mine site), a description of the <br />soils in Big Gypsum Valley, the stratigraphy of the Utavan Mineral Belt, the lack of groundwater <br />in the area, a very brief description of the surface water drainage system, and a descriF~tion of the <br />stormwater management plan (which EFN says prevents stormwater transport of potential <br />contaminants from the waste rock area). <br />The potential risk to human health or the environment section, according to EFN, addresses the key <br />issue; given the lack of significant risk posed by these properties, the existing mime permit <br />requirements are adequate to protect the public health and the environment. EFN presents a risk <br />assessment scenario with a conceptual model of the sites that identifies: potential or suspected <br />sources of contamination, types and concentrations of contaminants detected at the sites, ,potentially <br />contaminated media, and potential exposure pathways, including receptors. The only information <br />EFN presented concerning the types and concentrations of contaminants is a statemen¢ that "the <br />rocks contain low levels of naturally-occurring uranium", along with the results of a radiometrc <br />survey of the West Sunday waste dump and a rock outcrop near the mine site: Granted, the <br />scintillometer recordings showed lower radioactivity levels in the waste rock, but it does not <br />demonstrate that the waste rock does not have sufficient quantities of toxic-forming material to <br />adversely affect human health, property or the environment. EFN argues that collection and <br />analysis of detailed data concerning concentrations of potential contaminants is not required, if a <br />receptor either does not continually inhabit locations near exposure points or is expe<.ted to be <br />exposed only rarely, due to an advertent intrusion. EFN submitted a DOE report (putrlished on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.