GENERAL51119 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 1 of 3 Mount, Carl fy~,IGGa llUS }~ From: Humphries, Bruce GEN Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:50 PM To: Mount, Carl Cc: Crosby, Erica Subject: FW: Gold Basin Mine Carl please incorporate in some manner the short paragraph about the GPS points in your next letter to Vanella, thanks -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Erica Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:45 AM To: Humphries, Bruce Cc: Cheryl A. Linden (E-mail); Mount, Carl Subject: RE: Gold Basin Mine Bruce, Cheryl called me about the status of the Van Ella's. 1 sent her over this a-mail. Are you going to follow this up in a letter? If so, I would like you to add something that Cheryl and I discussed; The GPS points surveyed by the Division during the inspection were obtained from the location of the markers put in place by the o e~rator. The location of these markers depict an area of 3.8 acres. If these markers were incorrectly placed, then the operator should have the site surveyed and the operator should move the markers to depict the correct permit boundary. Any disturbance conducted by the operator outside of the boundary area will need to be included in permit in the form of an amendment. -----Original Message----- From: Humphries, Bruce Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 1:38 PM To: 'goldbasin@hotmail.com' Cc: Crosby, Erica; Mount, Carl Subject: RE: Gold Basin Mine This Email is in response to your letter of march 15, 2005. I will follow-up with letter, but wanted to get our response to you as soon as possible so that you may complete the permit amendment process. The Rules and Regulations are in the process of being revised to allow amendments to 110 permits. The form that you are completing or have completed is the existing form that does not allow the option of an amendment. We have, however, decided to allow you to submit an amendment application now rather than later using our existing application form that does not have acheck-off box for amendments. (Please address the completed application to our Ms. Erica Crosby so that we can make sure the administration staff do not return it to you.) I believe that our Ms. Crosby indicated in her inspection report that you should submit an amendment. We apologize for the confusion, but were trying give you a break on the permitting process by allowing you to submit an amendment rather than having to submit a whole new application. In reference to your other question. We agree with you that the area has been previously disturbed by other mining operations. We also agree that as long as you do not reaffect those previously affected areas, you are not responsible for its reclamation. You must, however, and it is your responsibility to document, using existing documents in permit files we have, photographs that you take, accurate maps of sufficient scale to fully describe the affected areas or other suitable means, so that it is clear what has been previously affected. 4/26/2005