My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51080
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MINE PLAN RECOMMENDATION PACKAGE
From
OSM & BLM
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-z- <br />7. The applicant has submitted proof showing that prior violations of <br />applicable law and regulations have been corrected (See MPR Section 2.03.5) <br />12.07.6(2)(8), 786.19(8)]. <br />8. The applicant has paid all fees for the Abandoned Mine Reclamation <br />Fund. (Verbal communications with Ann Yelton, OSM fee compliance officer, in <br />Albuquerque on February 1, 1982 by IiLRD). [2.07.6(2)(0), 786.19(h)]. , <br />9. The applicant does not control and has not controlled mining opera- <br />tions with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of such <br />nature, duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to the environ- <br />ment as to indicate an intent not to comply with the provisions of the Act <br />(See TA) [2.07.6(2)(h), 786.19(1)]. <br />10. Surface coal mining and reclamation operations to be performed under <br />•the permit will not be inconsistent with other such operations anticipated to <br />be performed in areas adjacent to the proposed permit area (See TA and BLM <br />letter [2.07.6(2)(3), 786.19(j)]. <br />11. The analysis shows that the bond amount will be adequate. The ap- <br />plicant is required to submit the performance bond required under the Act, the <br />approved State program, and the Federal Lands Program prior to permit issu- <br />ance. The bond would be made payable to both the United States and the State <br />of Colorado in the amount of $100,000.00 (See TA)[2.07.6(2)(j), 786.19(k) and <br />742.12(b)]. <br />® 12. The applicant has obtained a negative declaration with respect to <br />prime farmlands (see TA) [2.07.6(2)(k), 786.19(1)]. <br />13. Hay Gulch is considered to be an alluvial valley floor. No material <br />damage to the quality or quantity of water will occur; coal mining will not <br />interrupt, discontinue or preclude farming of the AVF and the operation will <br />preserve the hydrologic function. (See TA)[2.07.6(2)(k), 786.19(1)]. <br />14. The proposed postmining land use (livestock grazing and wildlife hab- <br />itat) of the permit area has been approved by the Colorado MLRD, OSM, and BLit <br />(See TA)[2.07.6(2)(1), 786.19(m)]. <br />15. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division and OSM have made all <br />specific approvals required by the Act, the approved Colorado State Program <br />and the Federal Lands Program (See State recommendation letter and 0511's <br />Summary of Findings)[2.07.6(2)(m), 786.19(n)]. <br />16. The proposed operation will not affect the continued existence of <br />endangered and threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse <br />modification of their critical habitats. (See Fish and Wildlife letter) <br />[2.07.6(2)(n), 786.19(0)]. <br />17. All procedures for public participation required by the Act, the ap- <br />proved Colorado State program, the Federal Lands Program, and Council on Envi- <br />ronmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Part 1500 et seq.) have been complied <br />with (See Chronology of Events) (741.21(a)(2)(li)). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.