Laserfiche WebLink
intermittent stream water occurs through surface fractures, there is a <br />possibility that riparian fauna and flora could be adversely impacted. <br />Socioeconomics <br />Under this alternative the King Coal P1ine would continue to operate and <br />approximately 70 people would remain employed. Over 51,000,000 annually <br />in payroll would continue to be spent for goods and services in the <br />area. Federal, state, and local governments would share approximately <br />5467,000 in tax revenues. <br />Miners would be able to have well paying jobs and live in their home <br />towns. Local people dependent upon coal for home heating ~~~ould have a <br />dependable local supply. Two tourist trains important to the area would <br />have a local source of coal for their operation. <br />ADUERSE ENV IROt~•1ENTAL EFFECTS <br />Possible subsidence caused by mining activity could cause surface distur- <br />bance resulting in soil erosion and loss of riparian fauna and flora. <br />It could also cause changes in water flow patterns, water quality, and <br />water discharge rates. <br />Surface disturbance from subsidence would likely occur in Pine Gulch, <br />the SE'aSW; of Sec. 32, T. 35 N., R. 11 W., N^1PM, where the overburden <br />.thickness is approximately 50 feet. In order to minimize the impacts of <br />subsidence and in accordance with the regulations 30 CFR 211.31 and <br />30 CFR 817.121, sufficient coal could .be left in place to prevent subsi- <br />dence (approximately 5-150 of the total reserves). Subsidence in the <br />Pine Gulch area will cause the impacts as stated above to the water <br />quality, soils, vegetation, and wildlife. This would provide for 1.41 <br />to 1.58 million tons of in-place coal reserves which will not provide <br />-the applicant with sufficient reserves for an eight year mine operation <br />at the current rate of production. <br />RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT-TER11 USES AND LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY <br />The short-term use of 1.41 to 1.58 million tons of coal will not affect <br />the long-term productivity of the environment in this area.. <br /> <br />~I <br />21 <br />