My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51080
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MINE PLAN RECOMMENDATION PACKAGE
From
OSM & BLM
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE CONSEQUENCES <br />ALTERNATIVE A -- PROPOSED .4CTION <br />It•1PACTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATIVE A <br />There will be no significant impacts to the climate, visual resources, <br />recreation, cultural resources, and .the present land use. <br />Air Quality <br />There should be an insignificant impact to the air quality of the area <br />as a result of t~e proposed action. Regional TSP levels may increase <br />less than 1 ug/m (AGM). The TSP levels at the proposed lease site may <br />increase less than 2 ug/m3 (AGt~1). CAAQS and NAAQS and the federal and <br />Colorado PSD increments will not be, exceeded. There should be no impact <br />on the air quality (as measured by the TSP levels) in the t•lesa Verde <br />National Park as a result of the proposed action. Visibility in the <br />region will be unaffected. <br /> Geology and Geographic Setting <br />Evidence of possible subsidence fractures is <br />present on the existing <br /> lease tract P-058300. The fractures were obs erved in an area approxi- <br /> mately 300 feet north of the emergency lease boundary. The area of <br /> possible subsidence is above the western edge of the pillars that were <br /> extracted in the mine approximately one year ago. <br />The above evidence suggests that subsidence could occur due to extrac- <br />tion of the 6-foot coal seam and pillars on retreat in the application <br />area. Although a maximum subsidence of 6 feet could occur, the most <br />-likely showing on the surface would be extension cracks such as, the ones <br />identified on the existing lease. This would especially be the case in <br />the SE';SW'< of section 32 (T. 35 N., R. 11 W., NM PM) where overburden <br />thickness is approximately 50 feet in the bottom of Pine Gulch. Exten- <br />sion cracks and other subsidence features would show on the surface at <br />any time from one year to any number of years after pillar extraction. - . <br />Subsidence fractures could allow the escape of methane gas to the surface <br />and could Increase the hazard of underground and surface fires.' Although <br />this is not likely due to the low liberation of methane in the mine <br />(less than 1`6), the potential of causing surface impacts i~s present. <br />Regulations in 30 CFR 211.31 and 817.121 require that underground mining <br />activities be planned and conducted to control or prevent subsidence and <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.