My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50986
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:25:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
NEWSPAPER CLIPPING
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> <br />Coal industry expressF~s Btu tax concern <br />ByJENNYJOIINSON economies of northwest Colorado Put Usilton says if increased taxes <br />Staff writer and the rate payers throughout the are deemed necessary, they should <br />The energy tax proposed by the state; he said. be placed on the utility (post electri- <br />Clinton edminietration would The proposed broad-based energy cal generation) rather than produc- <br />edveraely impact the number of tax would increase tax on the pro- ere so that it ie more directly paid for <br />jobs in the cost industry and would duction o[ coal at the rate of $.257 by consumers and eliminate the dou- <br />be detrimental to Colorado mining, per million Btu's (a measurement of ble jeopardy of additional royalty <br />said R. D. Usilton, president of tlreamountofenergyreleased). paid on the energy tax. <br />Colowyo Coal Company, the etate'e The Clinton administration says When applied to 10,700 Btu of <br />largest coal mine. the increase in tax imposed at the ~ coed, the tax equates to $5.50 per <br />°Our concern is based on the belief production phase will encourage ton. If the coal ie under federal <br />that any new tax added to the price conservation by making energy lease, another $.79 in royalties <br />of coal hurts the entire industry, the more expensive. would be added making a total of <br /> ~ $6.29 per ton. <br /> iJeilton said when today's average <br /> .price is $15 per ton, it is doubtful <br /> that all of the burden could be <br /> parsed on to consumers. In an effort <br /> to ,gain a competitive edge in the bid- <br /> durg process, producers would paz- <br /> tielly absorb some of the increased <br /> far; be said <br /> Already, the coal industry is ehvg- <br /> gli.ng with a nearly 40 percent <br /> decease in coal prices end a lose of <br /> almost half of its jobs i^ the last <br /> decade. Another tax burden would <br /> add another setback to a severely <br /> depressed industry, he said. <br /> IJeilton said the additional <br /> imxeeaed taxes would also increase <br /> Colowyo's supply costa by about <br /> $500,000 per year since their Isrge <br /> draglines are powered by electricity <br /> end trucks by diesel fuel. <br /> ]Local economies of northwest <br /> Colorado rely on the coal industry <br /> far a significant proportion of the job <br /> base es well as the 5nanael support <br /> through taxes paid by coal compa- <br /> nies, said Usilton. <br /> Colawyo alone employs 415 work- <br /> ers who are paid wages and benefits <br /> totalling over $24 million per year. <br /> ' ' At s time when high paying, sta- <br /> ble manufacturing and production <br /> jobs are becoming more and more <br /> ecarre in this country, ie questionable <br /> to adopt a proposed tax which threat- <br />ens the existence of these jobs," be <br />said. °1'his tax would certainly not <br />put Coloradans back to work.° <br />In 1992, the company paid over <br />$39 million in taxes, tees and royal- <br />ties to gavemment. If the proposed <br />taxes were incurred, Colowyo's taxes <br />and royalties would increase by an <br />additional $29 million, says Usilton. <br />Last yeaz, Colowyo produced and <br />sold over 4.6 million tons of high Btu <br />coal and is 44 percent below the <br />Clean Air Act's mandated level of <br />sulfur diaade. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.