Laserfiche WebLink
CESPK-CO-R Public Notice Number 199475348 <br />Overall, these changes will promote national consistency, more clearly notify the public of <br />regulatory requirements, ensure that the Section 404 regulatory program is more equitable to <br />the regulated public, enhance the protection of waters of the United States, acid clarify which <br />areas in agricultural crop production would not be regulated as waters of the United States. <br />As a result of this change, instream gravel mining operators are required to obtain Section <br />404 permit authorization for excavation activities. <br />Six other instream sand and gravel mining operations aze located on the Animas River north <br />of Durango. These operations vary in size, mining methods, and quantities mined. Active <br />operations, like the subject Walker Pit, were extended until August 25, 1996, in accordance <br />with the "grandfather provision" of the Corps' new excavation rule in order to allow public <br />notice review. Public notices are also being issued for comment on these operations as <br />listed below: <br />199475260 -Mountain Redi Mix -previously Animas Aggregates ('I'h~omas Pit), <br />upstream seven miles <br />199575400 -Burnett Construction (Bar D Pit), upstream five miles <br />199475345 -Michael Francis (I-Iermosa Meadows Pit), upstream four miles <br />199475346 - SANDCO (Dalton Pit), upstream three miles <br />194475347 -Animas Valley Sand & Gravel (AVSG Pit), upstream two miles <br />199475349 - SANDCO (Willow Bend Pit), downstream two miles <br />Agencies and individuals have expressed concern regarding the direct, indirect, and <br />cumulative impacts of excavating the Animas River bottom. Some concerns include <br />increased siltation, accelerated erosion of the riverbanks upstream and downstream, and the <br />decrease or loss of fish and wildlife habitat. The impacts of river mining can. be very <br />difficult to predict. A river study by a licensed hydrologist would be required in order to <br />accurately assess the potential effects of a specified operation. Complicating the situation <br />are the varying natural forces which increase river bank erosion, such as high. runoff seasons <br />and the tendency of rivers to meander and braid (build and adding sand bazs). Although a <br />comprehensive study of the Animas River mining operations was recommendf;d by the La <br />Plata County Planning Department as eazly as 1987, it has proven difficult to obtain full <br />participation and funding from the Animas River mining operators. The Corps of <br />Engineers, Sacramento District, Planning Division pursued the initiation of a study with the <br />State of Colorado in the late 1980s. The State, principally the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, opposed the study. Since the Corps <:ould not pursue a planning study unilaterally, <br />the proposal was abandoned. Therefore, a a~mprehensive hydrologic study of the Animas <br />River has not been performed. <br />The applicant has requested water quality certification from the State of Colorado, <br />Department of Public Health and Environment in accordance with Section 401. of the Clean <br />Water Act. Written comments on water quality certification should be submitted to Mr. <br />John Farrow, Planning and Standards Section, Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment, Water Quality Control Division, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive Soul:h, Denver, <br />Colorado, 80222-1530, on or before April 15, 1996. <br /> <br />