My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50842
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:17:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/2/1981
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE ASPECTS OF HAWKS NEST MINE
From
MLR
To
CAROL RUSSELL
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~• <br />i n 1 I <br />OEPARiMEN7 OF NATI)q AL flES~I 11nm~ n. i nen,n ~..~v,~„~.,, <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive DirectorU LACES III IIIIII'llllll <br />999 <br />MINI':I) I,ANI1 IiI~,1:I.AMA'I'11)N <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />March 2, 1981 <br />T0: Carol Russell ~ `c~~ <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton -~ <br />SUBJECT: `Subsidence ects Hawks Nest Mine <br />In anticipation of the completion of your Phase I review of lJestern Slope <br />Carbon's permanent permit application for the Hawks Nest Mine, I forward the <br />following comments concerning the subsidence aspects of that permit application. <br />~,(1) Western Slope Carbon states that all structures lie outside the area of <br />potential subsidence effect (outside the area defined by projecting '.:ie boundary <br />of the mined area to the surface along the projected angle of draw) and that <br />no renewable resource lands exist within the permit or adjacent areas. <br />To support the first contention WSC refers the reader to Exhibit 2.05.6-C. <br />Through some oversighton their part this Exhibit does not delineate the subsidence' <br />boundary mentioned. This oversight must be rectified. However, State highway <br />133 does constitute a structure and is proposed to be undermined by the east <br />portals. <br />In order to support their second contention Roy Cox and yourself will need to <br />corroborateWSC's contention that no renewable resource lands (including aquifers <br />and areas of recharged to aquifers) exist within the permit or adjacent areas. <br />(2) ,The subsidence monitoring program proposed within the application will have <br />~to be amended to, include the monuments shown on Figure 4.20.1-A paralleiling <br />State highway 133. In addition the application references the possible installation <br />of survey monuments above the longwall portions of the mine. Such monuments <br />should be installed and included on a plan. <br />t (3) WSC must describe the installation of its survey monuments to be used for <br />subsidence observation. These monuments must be permanent and capable of resisting <br />damage by normal traffic or climatic extremes. <br />(4) :Past generations of WSC's subsidence control plan for the Hawks Nest Mine <br />included steel arched supports within the portals driven beneath highway 133 at <br />the east mine portal. Reference is now made to steel arch support in the existing <br />portal within the control plan on page 4.02-4 of the permanent permit application. <br />However, the application does not propose to install steel arch support in the <br />additional proposed entries to be driven beneath that highway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.