My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50801
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:15:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/12/1994
From
THE CORLEY CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />The Corley Company <br />Phone 632-6050 P.O. Boa 1821 <br />COLORADO SP RiN GS, COLORADO 80901 <br />Jan. 9, 1994 <br />'J r.,-. <br />Mr. Larry Routten <br />Division of Minerals & Geology ,J~:~ 1 <br />I;;SC. <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver CO 80203 ~~•. <br />Dear Mr. Routten: <br />We just received the bid request document for the East Pit work. We had <br />been aware that the Dvision was planning to remove the access road <br />around Chen's Hill, but we were surprised to learn that the road into <br />the West Pit was going to be remove too. If that road is removed, there <br />will be not connection that is useful to gain access to the short road <br />at the drill hale site near the north centerline 1/16 corner that the <br />Division approved for retention. While that road is shorter, it would <br />become the same situation as the present Newlin Creek road with no <br />access at the proximal end. <br />The East Pit bid document also contains a drainage ditch (drainage ditch <br />2) which is nearly impossible to correlate with the ditches you propose, <br />but would seem to duplicate some of the functions. Drainage ditch 2 <br />would certainly prohibit the original ditch agreement. <br />The proposed letter to the Board lacks sufficient detail. It mentions a <br />miscalculation without any information about the size of the <br />miscalculation. It should be important that there is appro};imately a <br />600% error and that the Division refused to admit its error for about <br />one year until it had to accurately design the new ditches. We are not <br />interested in a letter that brushes over the Division's errors. <br />Could we have a copy of the Division's letter to the Vento Family Trusts <br />concerning the contour ditch cut onto the Vento property, please? <br />/Sincerely, <br />L~ <br />W.D. Corley, <br />President <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.