My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50766
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50766
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:19 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:13:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/14/1983
Doc Name
REMEASUREMENT OF PIT BOTTOM WIDTH OF GECS CURRENT PIT
From
GEC MINERALS INC
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />0 <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />GEC MINERALS, INC. <br />FLORENCE, COLORADO 81226 <br />P.O. BOX 225 <br />303/784-6891 <br />June 10, 1983 <br />Ms. Carol Russell <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Subject: Remeasurement of Pit Bottom Width <br />of GEC's Current Pit <br />Dear Carol: <br /> <br />~~ I i. ~.1 iU83 <br />P;~lIP!I_~ I_A•"'1 kl~-;;L.l1E~".iIi;PJ <br />Culo. Deis!. a. ';aie`~,! RC:SO;1fC0° <br />As requested, GEC Minerals, Inc. has conducted a ~~ape measurement <br />throughout the existing pit in regard to the pit bottom width eval- <br />uation. <br />The enclosed Exhibit, together with a 200 scale E.<isting Pit Bottom <br />Width Evaluation Map concludes the findings, which specifically <br />indicates the difference between this measurement. and the one made <br />by GEC before. Apparantly, there were certain vz•riations involved, <br />however, owing to the extra work backfilling, GEC. intends to carry <br />out the additional reclamation work which would in compensation of <br />the bonding amount, and using the same approach ~.~ GEC proposed on <br />our last Report - Phase II Reclamation Bonding Adjustments. By the <br />time the ramp of the haul road reaches the middle between Sec. 7 and <br />Sec. 6, the estimated yardage will have been back~`illed to make up <br />the bonding amount as planned. <br />Should you have any questions regarding this submission, please <br />let us know. <br />Ve yours, <br />L.K. Chen <br />UP-Mine Planning/Engineering <br />LKC:deMc <br />Enclosure <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.