Laserfiche WebLink
1. SUMMARY <br />1.1 Introduction <br />On October 9, 1984, Wolf Ridge Corporation (WRC), <br />the holder of four federal sodittm lease tracts within the <br />Piceance Basin in northwest Colorado, submitted a mine <br />plan to the Bureau of Land Manaf;ement (BLM) for a <br />commercial-scale nahcolite solution mine. Initial screening <br />of the mine plan indicated that it repre:xnted a major federal <br />action with the potential for significant impacts; therefore, <br />pursuant to Section 102 of the National Environmental <br />Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), BLM determined that an <br />environmental impact statement (EIS•) would be required <br />in conjunction with approval of the mine plan. <br />Four alternatives, including WR.C's proposal, were <br />described and analyzed in a draft EIS. The draft EIS analyzed <br />and defined the potential environmental and socioeconomic <br />effects of each of these alternatives. In addition, the draft <br />EIS identified necessary mitigation in ttte form of stipulations <br />that would be incorporated into the approved plan. <br />Following a 60-day public comment .period, this final EIS <br />was developed, based upon consideration of public <br />comments and an internal review of the draft EIS. This <br />final EIS, which is an abbreviated final, incorporates by <br />reference most of the draft EIS; therefore, the final EIS <br />must be aced in conjunction with the draft EIS. <br />1.2 Alternatives Analyzed <br />The following narrative briefly describes each of the <br />alternatives and summarizes rhea anticipated impacts. <br />1.2.1 No Action Alternative <br />This altemative involves construction and operation of <br />a 6-ton per hour (tph), 2-year maximum pilot-scale nahcolite <br />mine that was analyzed by BLM its an environmental <br />assessment (EA Number CO-010.86117) and approved io <br />a decision record signed May 2, 1986, acct subsequently <br />amended on September ]0, 1986 (Appendix A). Therefore, <br />this action (the pilot-scale mine) is independent of WRC's <br />commercial-scale mine plan and can occur, regardless of <br />the decision resulting from [his EIS anal~rsis. The pilot project <br />represents the continuation of current management practices <br />in the study area. Thus, under the No Action Alternative, <br />the approved pilot project will tale place; however, <br />expansion of the approved pilot project to a commercial- <br />scale will not occur. <br />Facilities approved for the pilot project include: a 5-acre <br />plant site, a 4-aae well field for in situ solution mining <br />of nahcolite, an evaporation pond encompassing 4 acres, <br />a new water well and ancillary pipeline, and upgrading <br />(including graveling) of the existing access road into the <br />plant site. <br />No significant impacts will result from the No Action <br />(Pilot Project) Alteroative. Minor short-term impacts will <br />occur to av quality, soils, vegetation, livestock grazing, water <br />resources, wildlife, and recreational/visual resources. <br />Cultural and paleontological resources will also be <br />potentially impactod. Existing and future mineral lease rights <br />could be complicated because of diminished surface <br />occupancy possibilities within the project development area. <br />Groundwater consumed by the pilot project will <br />incrementally contribute to the cumulative adverse <br />alterations of downstream endangered fish habitat, although <br />the project, by itself, will not jeopardize the continued <br />existence of any listed fish. Mitigation (conservation <br />measures) will be employed to compensate for any impact <br />resulting from the prlot project. <br />1.2.2 Proposed Action (Preferred <br />Alternative) <br />WRC's proposal involves construction and operation of <br />a commercial-scale nahcolite solution mine to produce <br />sodium bicarbonate at a maximum rate of 125,000 tons <br />per year (tpy) over a 30-year period. The proposal involves <br />phased-approach development, with initial production of <br />50,000 spy, increasing in the second or third year of operation <br />to 125,000 spy. <br />The Proposed Action would involve: expansion of the <br />approved pilot project well field and plant site, including <br />paving of the access road into the plant site (all affecting <br />up to 215 additional acres), cooswction of additional <br />evaporation ponds (affecting up to 22 additional acres), <br />construction of a natural gas pipeline into the plant site <br />(involving 17 acres), and addition of a warehouse/rail <br />loading facility at Lacy Station in Rifle, Colorado. <br />The only potentially significant impacts associated with <br />this altemative would be to local groundwater quantity and <br />quality. There would be a 3.2 percent reduction in average <br />daily Flow from Yellow Creek. This would be mitigated <br />through a state required water augmentation plan. The area <br />.at. . <br />