My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-10-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2004-10-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 12:09:15 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/20/2004
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN4
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />The probable hydrologic consequences of mining within the Deserado Permit Area <br />are addressed within Section II.C.S of the permit application. The permittee's <br />statement of hydrologic effects has been reviewed by the Division for compliance <br />with Rule 4.05.1 and 2.05.6(3). <br />Impact of the Mining Operation on Surface Water <br />Impacts to the hydrologic balance will occur as a result of the mine. Short-term <br />impacts which will occur as a result of surface facilities appurtenant to the under- <br />ground mine include reduction of water yield from the mine azea to the White <br />River, increased sediment loads from disturbed azeas, and water quality <br />degradation from the refuse disposal azea and mine water dischazge. Long-term <br />impacts will center on the effects of subsidence under Scullion Gulch and Red <br />Wash. See the subsidence section of this document for further discussion of <br />subsidence impacts. <br />Small, short-term surface water losses will occur as a result of two factors, <br />retention of water in ponds and removal of water from the White River Lagoon. <br />Runoff from disturbed azeas will be routed through sedimentation ponds, thereby <br />reducing the amount of flow to the White River. Evaporation losses will occur <br />because the ponds will not discharge runoff until some of the available storage <br />volume is filled. Very little of the impounded water will re-enter the ground <br />water system due to the clay subsoils which comprise the pond bottoms. Losses <br />from the D-Portal pond will be insignificant when compazed to total runoff from <br />the Scullion Gulch watershed. The pond is designed to store runoff from 44 <br />acres, while Scullion Gulch has a contributing drainage area of 7,552 acres at its <br />confluence with the White River. The refuse disposal azea ponds receive runoff <br />from approximately 98 acres, which is a very small portion of the 2,950 acres <br />drained by the Red Wash tributary through the northern sector of the permit azea. <br />$ased on this information, the net loss of surface water quantity to Red Wash <br />and the White River will be negligible. <br />Water supply for the mine will come from the White River Lagoon. Combined <br />water use and evaporative loss at full production is projected to consume 552 <br />acre-feet per yeaz at a withdrawal rate of .763 cubic feet per second. This <br />translates to less than 0.2 percent of the average annual flow in the river of 672 <br />cfs. Even during low flow conditions, when the average flow is 245 cfs, the <br />withdrawal rate will only be 0.31 percent of the available flow. Therefore, <br />adverse impacts on flow in the White River as a result of proposed withdrawal <br />should be minimal. Furthermore, the permittee has secured water rights <br />downstream of the mine that may be used if necessary to replace a depleted water <br />- - - source. -- - - - - --- - - - <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.