Laserfiche WebLink
c) The boundaries of the National Park System, the National Wildlife <br />Refuge System, the National System of Trails, the National <br />Wilderness Preservation System, the Wild and Scenic Rivers System <br />including rivers under study for designation, and National <br />Recreation Areas (2.07.6(2)(d>(iii>(A)); <br />d> Three hundred feet of any public building, school, church, <br />community or institutional building, or public park <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(B)); <br />e) One hundred feet of a cemetary (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(G ); <br />f> The boundaries of any National forest unless the required finding <br />of compatibility has been made by the Secretary of the U.S. <br />Department of Agriculture (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(D)); <br />g> One hundred feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public <br />road except where mine access or haul roads join such line, and <br />excepting any roads for which the necessary approvals have been <br />received, notices published, public hearing opportunities provided, <br />and written findings made (2.07.6(2)(d)(iv)); <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver <br />from the owner has been provided (2.07.6(2)(d)(v)>. <br />5. On the basis of information submitted by Grand River Institute, the <br />Division finds that, subject to valid existing rights as of <br />August 3, 1977, the mining operation will not adversely affect any <br />publicly owned park or place listed on or eligible for listing in the <br />National Register of Historic Places as determined by the State Historic <br />Preservation Office. <br />The Fruita Mine site is already in a reclamation status. This proposed <br />permit is to be issued for reclamation only and no new disturbance will <br />take place. Therefore, no sites listed or eligible for listing on the <br />National Register of Historic Places as determined by SHPO shall be <br />adversely affected (2.07.6(2>(e)(i)). <br />6. For this surface mining operation, private mineral estate has not been <br />severed from private surface estate: therefore, the documentation <br />specified by Rule 2.03.6(2) is not required (2.07.6(2)(f)>. <br />7. On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from <br />other state and federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) <br />compliance review required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining <br />Reclamation Act, the Division finds that American Shield Coal Company <br />owns an operation which is currently in violation of Rule 4.14.1(2)(a> <br />but is in the process of correcting such violation. As decided in a <br />settlement agreement between American Shield Coal Company and CMLRB on <br />March 25, 1992, the operator shall: 1) Apply for an application for <br />reclamation only and obtain a valid permit by December 31, 1992; <br />-6- <br />