My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL50428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL50428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:36:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/12/1984
Doc Name
INITIAL REVIEW COMMENTS
From
OSM
To
DNR
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IC should be remembered that closed basins created during mining should be <br />'1 balanced against existing noncontributing areas, when estimating resulting <br />- streamflow depletion. For example, Historically glaciated areas of many <br />North Dakota mines are internally drained; while 85 percent of the permit <br />area of the East Gillete mine in Wyoming is comprised of closed basins, <br />resulting from Historic coal burns. Also to be considered are existing <br />Stack ponds and internally draining, previously mined areas that will be <br />reclaimed to discharging areas by current operations. <br />Increased infiltration <br />This is an abstraction from runoff above premining conditions resulting <br />from the regulatory requirements to reestablish infiltration rates. <br />Because compliance with this requirement must be demonstrated, there should <br />be estimates available comparing premining and postmining infiltration <br />rates. Althougn differences in infiltration may be slight, runoff from the _ " <br />entire reclamation surface could constitute a definable abstraction from <br />streamflow, assuming higher postmining infiltration. It is recommended <br />that premining and postmining infiltration rates be compared and, if <br />significantly different, that runoff effects be estimated possibly on trie <br />basis of the resulting change in annual unit runoff for the mine area. <br />Aquifer interruption <br />This is disruption of aquifers that are tributary to surface flows and, as <br />such, eliminates from consideration deep aquifers that are hydraulically <br />isolated from surface flows. Disruption of alluvial aquifers which are not <br />AVF's, and, hence, do not have to be restored constitutes the most direct <br />effect on streamflow. However, disruption of aquifers wnicn subcrop <br />beneath alluvial aquifers, as discussed for underground mines, may also <br />affect streamflow. Because downstream flows .nay be affected, in most cases <br />estimates of changes in alluvia] underflow resulting from mining should be <br />available for estimating streamflow depletions. <br />It is recommended that depletions from streamflow resulting from <br />disruptions of mine-area alluvial aquifers be estimated in most cases. <br />However, because streamflow effects resulting from disruption to aquifers , <br />subcropping beneath alluvial aquifers are indirect and difficult to <br />estimate, in such cases it is recommended that only clearly-demonstrated <br />and quantifiable effects be considered in estimating streamflow depletion. <br />Mine water rights <br />See discussion under Underground Mines. <br />Well pumpage <br />cell pumpage at mining operations usually represents potable water supplies <br />from good quality, deep aquifers which are Hydraulically isolated frorn <br />surface flows. Therefore, it is recommended that only well pumpage from <br />alluvial wells for uses such as oust control or coal processing be <br />considered as streamflow depletions. <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.